I have setup an Active/passive cluster with a front end/backend config
behind a firewall. Firewall has been configured to pass HTTP to the front
end server. If on a computer outside the firewall I type the URL of the OWA,
I get the Windows authentication screen but having entered the username and
ive.
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:20 AM
&g
ng the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:20 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OWA Front/back end in Cluster
>
>
d C. is one of the brightest folks we have here. He may have
'alternative' answers and very 'direct' answers, but they will never be
'unintelligent.' You'd do well to ask him to explain what he meant, you
might learn something.
Good luck.
David
-Original Mess
I have a FE/BE configuration with Exchange 2003. When I use the URL
http://FE server/Exchange, I get the Window's Security popup but after login
I get two frames each of them with HTTP error 404, File or Directory not
found. I do not have URLScan nor have I run IISlockdown tool.
Any help would be
the back-end server only?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
Posted At: 22 December 2003 21:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: HTTP error 404 and OWA
Subject: HTTP error 404 and OWA
I have a FE/BE configuration wi
Actually Double Take works for replication, however it is not High
Availability Solution as the developer NSI or Sunbelt promote it on their
site. But if you just want the data replicated then if you tweek it (and not
according to their support way's soultion) , it does the job.
Their other soluti
I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend
$2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have
gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I
could also add or point me to other resources.
Thanks
the extra 20 gra
One of our offices is Win NT 4.0, Exchange 5.5 Sp4
Even though mail is flowing fine and everyone is getting/sending mail with
no problem but there are 32000 items since yesterday in the MTA folder.
I have tried to look up old discussion on MTA in this group but I have not
been able to find the answ
I have setup a 2+1 cluster node in our lab (two active one passive)as
back-end server plus a front-end server. It looks like that the cluster
works as far as when one shuts down a node the passive node takes over the
services of that node, or even when the network cable is unplugged.
However, there
Has anyone been able to get help or even download MailMarshal's latest
updates since they were bought by NetIQ?
It seems that they never answer any calls and have become as bad as GFI.
Trend Micro is sounding better and better every day.
__
I have installed and setup E2K, SP2 within the same domain as our existing
Exch 5.5, SP6. I can successfuly move mail boxes from 5.5 to E2K. Internal
messages from boxes within 5.5 are properly sent to boxes within E2K.
However, any messages coming from outside do not get to any of the boxes in
E2
ver as just another Exchange server, it sends
> to it the same way it would send to another 5.5 server in the site. What
> problem do you have that you are trying to solve?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 3
Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send
messages out to the world. No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC .
A sample copy of the NDR is below:
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM
> The e-mail address could not be found. Perha
Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS.
And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM
Subject:
e which appears on the mailbox objects
> > in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the
> > EXCHANGE2 server?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM
> >
;Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
> If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and
> deliver?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M2web [mailt
.5 in the same domain
> If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Re:
E: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
> Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and
have
> an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant.
> Use Q153119 if you need help.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I have one forest and one domain.
I have run ForestPrep waited and then run DomainPrep, with no errors.
However when I try to manually look at the below object
cn=ms-Exch-Schema-Version-Pt, cn=schema, cn=configuration, dc=
to see that replication has occurred on any of the DCs including the one
I asked this problem a couple of days ago but the answers did not help and I
notice that there are others in this list and several other lists with the
same exact problem but still no solution, so I am going to ask one more time
having done all the solotions been suggested to my post or posts simi
y
> answers to this question in the archive? (Some of which are going on a
year
> old now)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:07 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: One more tim
where did you do this? Why didn't the
recipient update service handle this automatically? What is your default
SMTP proxy?
Mark
Plus Pack for OWA
SecureLogoff for OWA
http://www.messageware.net
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 200
n.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:16 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: One more time OWA setup problems
Subject: Re: One more time OWA setup problems
I changed to basic authentication used several usersI
Do not select the No Loss Restor.
One other little known fact. Restore DS. Start DS. Stop DS. Restore
Priv/Pub. Do not Run isinteg, Start Ds, Start others.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Dugas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 200
We have a one forest (corp.company.com), three child domain
(site1.corp.company.com, site2... and site3...) AD setup.
The account which the forestprep was run under is in the forest root. And
Domainprep was run at each site using the administrator account of each
site.
We want to setup E2k in each
We have three site that are connected together thru site connectors.
We have also setup free/busy connectors at system folders.
I am able to see the free/busy schedules of other sites but they are not
able to see ours. I have looked at the properties of the connector and in
the Replica tab I see u
Yes, I checked on the other servers and we are on their replica tab.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mail
Yes, that was actually done a when we first installed Norton.
- Original Message -
From: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:07 AM
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Schedule not working
> Have you looked at
For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot
cheaper
www.marshalsoftware.com
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM
> Subject: RE: Email Scanners
>
>
> >
>
Same with MailMarshal and we scan on average 35000 emails daily.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony L. Sollars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:36 PM
> Subject: RE: Email Scanners
>
>
> > WE use Sybari Ant
For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper
www.marshalsoftware.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM
Subject: RE: Email Scanners
>
> It's not the sig.
Same with MailMarshal and we scan on average 35000 emails daily.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony L. Sollars" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Email Scanners
> WE use Sybari Antigen and Absolute
s, too?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Fw: Email Scanners
>
>
>
>
>
> For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot
> cheap
Would anyone know or used Procmail to do mail filtering for viruses,
subjects, addresses etc.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.as
il
> Used what?
> What is that?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Procmail
>
>
> Would anyone know or used Pro
ber 10, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: Procmail
> Know of it, haven't used it... Plenty of info at procmail.org. Specific
> question?
>
> Chris
> --
> Chris Scharff
> Senior Sales Engineer
> MessageOne
> If you can't measure, you can't manage!
>
>
&g
I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange
5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or
vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not
created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property
7;mailbox' or an object is sent
> to the mailbox, like a new email.
>
> William
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> I ha
2 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question
> And none of that information seemed relevant enough to include in the
> original post? You can't resolve the name using the Outlook client, does
it
> appear in the GAL? On all machines? Error messages in the event log?
> Changes?
No, I do not.
- Original Message -
From: "Callan, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question
> Do you have an SRS Server.
>
> -Or
I have a test lab with Exch5.5 Sp4, Exch2000 SP3 on Win2k SP3. I am trying
to install Exch 2003 on Win2K SP3 but I get an error that the ADC needs to
be upgraded. Installation of ADC 2003 has only choices of Reinstall or
Remove so I chose Reinstall however in the middle it stopped with an error
tha
www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?releaseID=29085
Q289606 . If this is for Exchange the above link is for 5.5 version
2000 version is on ex2000 resource kit.
- Original Message -
From: "Reed, Alexander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday
If you want a faster more responsive and easier on clients OWA then E2k3 is
much superior to E2k2.
Migrating from 5.5 to E2K3 is also much more smoother.
If you are going to use any wireless PDA, Pocket PC etc then E2K3 is the
answer.
- Original Message -
From: "Clishe, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTE
It is interesting, I am having the same exact problem which started about 3
weeks ago.
The MTA databases do not get deleted after a backup, I get the error he is
getting. However if I stop and start the services the databases are then
automatically deleted.. Mine is also behind a firewall, not mult
: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: MTA database error
> There's a firewall between this server and other Exchange servers it
> communicates with?
>
uesday, January 21, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: MTA database error
> And nothing has changed? Run any netdiag utilities?
>
> On 1/21/03 16:15, "M2web" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> yes there is. it communicates between two other exchange servers thru our
> N
Hello All
Is there a way to set in Exchange 5.5 to not see the public folders which
are not set to replicate between different sites.
We have three sites with a total of 2500 public folders (do not ask me why)
but only 23 of them are set to replicate to each site. Is it possible not
see the other
nesday, January 22, 2003 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: Public Folders
> Set the Is Not Visible Attribute on each of the 2477 public folders, or
set
> on all, and unset on the 23?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 23 Janu
We have in of our sites 100 people and 121GB IS (one VP has 2.53 Million
emails with 2.1 M of them unread since 1999 and will not allow anyone to
delete them), use DLT to backup.
- Original Message -
From: "Pillai, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
Does anyone use Mail Marshal.
What has your experience been with them lately regarding their Support?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.
see your company get any
bigger. If so, you are in trouble.
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
We have in of our sites 100 people and 121GB IS (one VP has 2
We have a network admin in one of our sister companies that has made his
Exchange server which happens to be in the same org as ours with site
replications, to be also a WINS server.
Our mutual supervisor does not listen to my arguments against having
Exchange to be a WINS server too. Would anyon
business). You can run WINS off of an old moldy workstation - what is his
> really good reason for doing this?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Exchan
e will probably
hammer
> his own nails in his coffin.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:43 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange as WINS
>
>
> He is totally against MS Products
I am trying to change the LDAP port from 389 to 390. However I get a message
which says:
The directory is busy, wait a few minutes and try again.
Microsoft Exchange Directory
ID no: DS_ E_ BUSY
I have stopped and started services but I still get the above error.
I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you
provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything
worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5
- Original Message -
From: "Pillai, Raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exc
f there is
anything
> missing.
>
> Thanks for all your help.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes...
>
>
> I had the same p
Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with
a wise a.se comment!
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes...
>
change Migration woes...
> Are you suggesting: -
> - I uninstall exchange 2k manually.
> - Remove ADC
> - Re install ADC, create CA and sych.
> -install E2k etc...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002
Mailmarshal at MarshalSoftware.com.
Have been using it for 2 years. Works great!
- Original Message -
From: "Louanne Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:48 PM
Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions
Does anyone have recom
we have an office which has Ex5.5, SP4 on a WinNT4.0 SP6a and a separate box
which has the OWA. Does anyone see a problem upgrading the OS on the OWA box
which at this moment is WinNT 4.0 to Win2K with IIS 5.0?
_
List posting FAQ:
I have worked in the past 5 months with Win2K3 and E2k3 clustering both
Active/Active and Active/Passive the issues which you talk about have in
large part gone. However we choose to go with Active/Passive because of
lic. Issue. In active/active one needs one more lic for win2k3 and E2k3
Ent but in
63 matches
Mail list logo
