Dear All,
We use public folders for enterprise wide address books
However, when someone wants to send an email to someone contained in one of
these public folders, they have to go into it, right click the contact, and
select "new message"
I have been asked if it is possible to have these public
er as an email address book" box.
When they compose a new message and click "To..." they'll be able to select
the public folder as an address book from the drop-down list.
Neil
-Original Message-----
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At
Reminds me of a call I got from an engineer from site once, he was
installing some software into one of our old clone machines I'd sent to
site, and was groaning because it was "...that old system, NT4. I think its
got a virus because the system idle process is hogging all the CPU" once I'd
stoppe
Dear All,
I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask,
but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a
consultant.
Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using
Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities.
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > Atlanta, GA
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
&g
0-50 users is insane.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM
> To
essage-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:07 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
>
>
> Would you suggest all users connect with outlook in 'Exchange Mode'
I've had these on all my Win2k and XP machines at home
Its titled WEBPOPUP but is actually the messenger service dialog, as if a
net send command was received
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 15:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
tlook/evaluation/performance.asp
This gives some good tips on tuning for slow links/dialup/etc.
cheers
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 09:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
How
: RE: Advice on infrastructure design
Niki,
If they're large, you're right it'll take ages. However, why not just
EXMerge them to .PSTs on each of the servers, copy onto CDs and carry or
post.
Regards,
Mike Scott
EPS Ltd
-----Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailt
o run things
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit
(which we don't have)
Thanks
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/sea
Ok, I've found it on ftppss.microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 24 October 2002 10:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EXMerge
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit
(which we don't have)
T
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to asce
"
-----Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyon
elect the first check
box at the top and select all inconsistencies at the bottom. Do NOT touch
anything to do with the public folders. This should recreate the directory
object for the mailbox listed in the information store.
Jeff
-Original Message-----
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mail
Am I right in thinking that if a user working in an offline environment
creates a subfolder under their Inbox, that they need to be taught how to
mark that folder to be synchronized?
Theres no way of making all new folders, by default, included in
synchronization
Thanks
_
...also, we have lost the ability to 'open other users folder'
Is this simply not workable with offline working? Or is there a workaround
thanks
-Original Message-----
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 01 November 2002 13:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Working Offl
working
offline, because you are working *offline*. If they want to connect to
other users' folders, they will have to work online.
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
a performance hit, and if so, it
> should
be
> minimal.
>
> James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
> Associate Systems Administrator
> InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk]
&
Dear All,
We have several public folders used as address books
User are complaining that they only get to see the name of the contact, and
not the
associated email address, or their company. (sounds like an MCP question)
Is there a way of automatically changing the contacts to display the name a
Thanks for that info, Greg
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:greg@;infonition.com]
Sent: 05 November 2002 18:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 2002 contacts
If you are talking about looking at the public folder, switch to "Address
Card" view OR use View | Curr
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and he mentioned this
phrase in passing, that they used PST files when user mailboxes became full
I didn't dwell on this as we were talking about something else, but can
anyone suggest what he may have meant? We are now enforcing stricter limits
sing a PST for 'overflow'
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete
old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox
sizes. So they "move" to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic
backup of that PST as
email that old.
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and h
email that old.
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using a PST for 'overflow'
I was having a discussion with someone the other day and h
We have moved some users from a remote Exchange Server to our central server
at head office, and deleted the server using Exchange Administrator
However, I'm getting the following MTA errors in Event Viewer every 10 mins
on the central server where the mailboxes are now located
Event ID: 9318
Sou
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 December 2002 00:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA Error after deleting server
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9318&source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield
- Exchange
Hello
Have a frustrating problem that's greeted me back to work
Running Exchange Server 5.5 on NT Server 4 with SP6a
No problems prior to christmas, all that has happened to the
server over the break is one of the techs have applied the latest
critical updates as recommended on windows update, n
No-one have any ideas? :(
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 02 January 2003 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA Authentication Problem
Hello
Have a frustrating problem that's greeted me back to work
Running Exchange Server 5.5 on NT Server 4 with
Hello
Can anyone recommend a good, free mailing list software package for MS
Exchange Server 5.5
Thanks in advance
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.co
developing this.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:10 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Free Mailing List Software
> Sensitivity: Private
>
>
> Hello
>
>
; There are some 3rd party mailing list products for Exchange,
> none of them are particularly good IMHO, and none are free. Sorry.
>
>
> On 1/17/03 8:55, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Its not a commercial thin
ftware
>
>
> Putting up with those is what gets you 'free' lists right?
>
> On 1/17/03 9:08, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Ok thanks, guess we'll have to put up with the adverts and
>
Mines smaller than yours
9gb !
Using a HP Surestore DAT 12/24 on a Compaq ML370
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 January 2003 17:03
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
>
>
> Exhange 2k, Win2k
>
> Is
Hi
Been asked to look at this for someone
Server is Exch 5.5 SP3 running on NT4 SP6a
Upon examining logs routinely, it seems outbound internet mail is going via
another IMS at another company
The Edu.TW domain is nothing to do with us, and mail should go direct from
ourdomain.co.uk to recipient
Chris,
They're the event viewer application logs on the sending exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
> Upon examining logs routinel
net mail taking an obscure extra step?
Post one that hasn't been modified.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
What do the event logs say?
On 3/4/03 9:38, "Niki Blowfield - Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Chris,
>
> They&#x
WINS only, DNS servers for
internet access are at our ISP
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 04 March 2003 15:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscure extra step?
Roger
Sorry about that, just sent another email and generate
tajen.edu.tw domain show correctly configured relay
restrictions)
Michel
> -Original Message-----
> From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Internet mail taking an obscu
er be able to send mail to tajen.edu.tw!
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niki
>
Dear All,
I havent had any success searching the archives to get the answer to this no
doubt frequentley asked question
Does anyone have a resource for a list of attachments that should be blocked
at our Exchange Server?
We have Trend Scanmail which makes it very easy to block attachments, and
Dear All,
We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name
24/7
This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a
single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works
until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on a
ECTED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing Outlook
er, lock the workstation?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Securing Outlook
Dear All
uire
an Outlook client up and running?
- Original Message -----
From: "Niki Blowfield : Exchange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: Securing Outlook
> Dear All,
>
>
TED]]
Sent: 16 May 2002 17:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing Outlook
Based on the operational conditions, the desired objective cannot be
achieved. Since security is not a concern for the machine or network as a
whole, one portion thereof cannot be protected.
> -----Original Mes
47 matches
Mail list logo
