Nemx Power tools for exchange
www.nemx.com
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: System wide signature
Thanks for the information, but we are using outlook
hmmm, I have tree EX5.5 sp4 running on Win2K sp4. The only problem so far is
the I have to stop the services manualy if I want to run the optimizer. I
can live with that :). Oh one more thingy , EX was instaled after sp4 foe
Win2k
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL
Jason,
Did you do a search on support.microsoft.com for 0xc0020534 ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 7:47 PM
Subject: Can not map exchange 5.5 to domain controller
Have a domain
Wade,
I had the same problem with two different servers. In both cases it was the
APC UPS. Replaced the UPS and I never seen the problem again
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Wade Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:59
Sorry Chris, I have my own, starting from '95.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: Archives - Buy yours today.
I'm looking to make more money off of my
: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Brightmail
Huh?
You got your math wrong, Andrey.
Alberto,
Contact me offline if you want more input on nemx.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL
Huh?
You got your math wrong, Andrey.
Alberto,
Contact me offline if you want more input on nemx.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: Brightmail
Hehe
Mike,
I'm using it succesfuly. It quarantines about 2000 messages a day of wich 20
are legit mesagess.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Mike Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:50 PM
Subject: Feedback request - NEMX
T many.
Use a VPN solution
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 5:47 PM
Subject: Exchange admin console trhough firewalls
Hi All
MSX5.5 SP4
Please do you
Jim,
Remember categorizer = AD lookup :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange
, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage
It uses the amount it needs.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: Store.exe memmory usage
Hi all,
I
Hi all,
I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all
available memmory. :-(
Config: IBM box with 3 CPU, 3GB RAM, RAID1 for c:\, (os) RAID1 for
d:\(swap), RAID1 for e:\ (logs) and RAID5 for f:\ (db).
More than 1000 users. I have the /3GB switch in boot.ini. Store.exe
store.exe will use the lesser of all available memory and all the memory
it
needs.
Give it time. :o)
William
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe memmory usage
Hi all
moving so many, you defiently
should.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage
I did. Over the last week I moved over 500 users to this box and the
memory
use
Receiving user over his/her quota?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits
I understand and I think the issue here is my poor communication
-abuse.org I would be getting return emails with
error message, and that error message will pointe me to the mail-abuse.org
web site.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: DNS
Irfan,
Your
Service account in E2K ?
I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a
production box:
1. User A is transferred from site A to site B
2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't
you of course ;))
/Peter
- Original Message -
to...)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Full access
Subject: Re: Full access
Service account in E2K ?
I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use
)
Don Ely
Network Engineer
Tripath Imaging, Inc.
(336) 290-8293 - Direct
(336) 516-4519 - Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM
Irfan,
Your server at 202.125.129.114 is in the mail-abuse.org rss database. They
think that your server is an open relay. Is it?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject:
What else is running on this machine?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:38 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server
I am running Exchage Server 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a. Everyday, the server
will
Robert,
Why do you have PSTs on file servers?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Leeann McCallum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: Burning PST files.
No. You need to copy it back to h/d because the pst
John,
Check out the ex server config tool at Dell. I just run it with your config
and came back with two dual pro 2550 in FE/BE config, but I would take it
with some salt.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Darren,
It was newer on microsoft.com :)
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/nyheter/feb01/Q209354%20-%20HOWTO.htm
It is on yours.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: Check
Jonathan,
Can't you just right click on the policy, choose delete ? It works for me.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: 2 default recipient policies
I have
You can't.
May I ask why you want to do this?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum receipt headers exceeded (possible mail loop).
Can anyone help me w/
to one
server and I get this error.
Right now I have one system accepting mail then transfer it over and the
other one sends.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Maximum
Dean,
Are we talking here about calaba.com? If yes, the MX record for calaba.com
is pointing to a sendmail server.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: connecting
have a second domain: mywebfeed.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: 25 January 2002 14:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: connecting mail to internet...
Dean,
Are we talking here about calaba.com? If yes
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: 25 January 2002 14:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: connecting mail to internet...
That looks OK. I get an EX2K machine there. Give me a valid e-mail
address
Lori,
You may want to contact somebody from Compaq.
Here is a part of the header of one of the rejected messages:
Received: from intm1.sparklist.com (intm1.sparklist.com [207.250.144.17]) by
zmamail01.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D492C3440 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Jan 2002
if the server accepted this message where can I find the message you
sent???
I appreciate the help!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: 25 January 2002 14:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: connecting mail to internet
overnight, so someone figured it out.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Message rejected
Lori,
You may want to contact somebody from Compaq.
Here is a part of the header of one
Jim,
Depends on your current infrastructure and future needs. The answer for all
5 questions based on the info, is from 0 to infinity.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:59
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
Check with your firewall vendor if they have a vpn add-on. Most do.
/Peter
- Original Message
Tony,
Check your PIX settings
/P
- Original Message -
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: New server not able to receive pop3 mail
They are setup to authenticate. When I setup the accounts
Ok,
So my 266Mhz 512 KB server with a 38GB IS is an overkill ? ;)
/P
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: High Physical Memory Utilization
Well, I have found something
http://ww.orbz.org/io.php
/P
- Original Message -
From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:28 AM
Subject: ORBZ Question . . .
Just Curious . . . Anyone know the difference between INPUTS and OUTPUTS
in
the
Robert,
Restart www service on the server. I've seen this before, it is a
dependency problem, the www service starts before the ex services are up
hence can't find the M: drive.
/P
- Original Message -
From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hoops, wrong tread :(
/P
- Original Message -
From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Calendar
Robert,
Restart www service on the server. I've seen this before, it is a
dependency
Restart www service on the server. I've seen this before, it is a
dependency problem, the www service starts before the ex services are up
hence can't find the M: drive.
/P
- Original Message -
From: Michael Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
even when I change it back I get nothing.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Ronald,
If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then
you
have
: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Don,
I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix
,
but never heard of any with http.
Ronald,
The easiet way to make sure is not the pix
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Don,
I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix
,
but never heard of any with http.
Ronald,
The easiet
David,
We all know what M$ means. Don made a suble (at least he tried ;))
refference that we don't like that moniker here.
/P
- Original Message -
From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject:
Ronald,
If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you
have an authentication problem on your OWA server, nothing to do with your
proxy or PIX. for a proxy server or a pix f/w http is http is http.
period. On your OWA server diasble any other authentication but
correctly. Not always,
but I've seen it.
D
Ignorance: It's amazing how much easier it is for a team to work together
when no one has any idea where they're going. - - http://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17
Rob,
You HAD a mail loop, 50 MB Priv. store? My server at home has a priv.edb
biger than 1GB.
BTW: walk away from the server, get a professional to fix it and get
yourself a good exchange book. Read it, read it again and then maybe you are
alowed back to the server.
/Peter
- Original
You do have backups, right?
/P
- Original Message -
From: Rob Yeldon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
Following what seems to be a large number of (5MB)log files,
Wilson,
He would have the highest SIS in history. Greater than 1:100 G
/P
- Original Message -
From: Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 - unable to mount mail stores
If you
, but how we
behave when we don't know what to do. -John Holt
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Don,
I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp
Eric,
I'm using the WinXPpro and Office XP with encryption w/o any problems. Can
they read encrypted messagess? What error message they get when trying to
send?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
unencrypted or cancel, and it logs the
event id 2.(see below)
e-
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Encrypted Emails - XP?
Eric,
I'm using the WinXPpro and Office XP
Dustin,
Try - Tools - Options - Mail Services - Reconfigure...
/P
-Original Message-
From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT Outlook 2000 Standard.
been there, done that! :-)
Dustin
Don,
Please reread John's original posting. /Qouote: All our Exchange
server are within the same site./Unquote.
No need for any aditional IMS.
/Peter
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 7:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
. That is no need for
site connector at all. If there is no need for any additional IMS, how
would this server knows how to send the outside email to the IMS server
in the central site?
John Shi
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:11 PM
at all. If there is no need for any additional IMS, how
would this server knows how to send the outside email to the IMS server
in the central site?
John Shi
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 on a W2K server
Maybe I'm missing something. Can you install OWA 5.5 on a Win2K server?
Tara Stephens
1.5 GB/hour from a 266/640 to a 933/640 in bussines hours.
/Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox move rates
Assuming relatively contemporary target system hardware and
) virus-scanning service kicking in as
soon as they are created and preventing them being released for deletion by
the indexing service in time?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2001 23:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K full-text
Hi,
I have 2 E2K sp1 w2k sp2 servers with full-text indexing enabled on the
private store. One of them went down the other day reporting c: drive
full. After some seaching we found 5 GB worth of Exel files in
c:\winnt\temp\gthrsvc. It is looks like when the indexing is running it
will make a
61 matches
Mail list logo
