RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments

onths showing 99.98% uptime. Best wishes Russell PS - Friends don't let friends cluster exchange -Original Message- From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for anti-clustering arguments OK, I know th

RE: Virus with XP

Hi there This is a known virus - Symantec has a removal tool for this. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus with XP My home computer (window XP) was infected with

RE: Error I had not seen before

Hi there Make sure you have both a host and lmhost on the boxes. I did this and the messages disappeared. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error I had not

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

Thank you very much for all your information! Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes The newsfeed is http://www.thundermain.com/rss/ I use

RE: Hot off the Fixes....

Hi Martin Can you tell me how you did this? I just downloaded a RSS newsreader and I don't know how to get it to work with MS.. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discus

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

If it helps, we use Postini. Not too expensive while fighting off viruses and spam. It's work a look. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how does everyone

RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS

Friends don't let friends cluster Exchange Russell -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS If brute force isn't working for you, chances are,

RE: Anyone else having trouble with AOLs new SPAM rules?

Hi all For whatever it's worth, ever since AOL started their new anti spam program, getting email to them is a horror show. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

RE: Routing Goups query

If you can't send from the box, try running WinRoute and see information that provides... Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Routing Goups query It'

RE: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail)

There are two that I like: Singlefin Postini Both seem to work rather well. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd Party SPAM block companies besides edoxs (Brightmail

RE: AV/Spam scanning services

Hi there I have used Frontbridge - good but pricey. Singlefin is good and much less expensive - but small. We're testing Postini right now. My opinion - Singlefin, then Postini. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, Augu

RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much

hat happens. HTH Russell PS - If you find the answer, please post it here so we can both learn. -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello Russell, Thanks for replying... here are the answers

RE: "Requesting Data from Exchange Server" too much

but again, I've been burnt on that also). 3) Is this all users or one user? 4) I would start with DNS. Make sure everything is resolving properly. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussion

RE: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet?

guess what I didn't use! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions I agree. My esteemed employer allows out of office notifications to the Internet, so I never use the feature.

RE: HELP EseUtil still going.

Same thing happened to me 2 weeks ago. Are you upgrading to 2000 or to 5.5 Enterprise? If just the Enterprise edition, it's very quick and painless. Just make sure you have a solid backup and your TechNet handy in case you run into a little snag like we did with Q233219. > We hit the 16GB limit

RE: Conflict Message appears in a different language

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell = > Hopkinson > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:09 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Conflict Message appears in a different language > > > Lately, and for some unknown reason, conflict messages delivered to a = > pu

Re: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages

r ISP won't allow them to whitelist our IP address. Mail going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is routed through a different ISP who doesn't use this list to block spam. > Why not just tell them to send it to the correct SMTP address? > > - Original Message - > From: "Russ

Conflict Message appears in a different language

Lately, and for some unknown reason, conflict messages delivered to a public folder have the subject in a different language: "Zpráva o konfliktu" (which is Czech, I think). However, when I open the message, it's in English. I also get conflict notification messages in my Inbox, and their subject

RE: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages

To the whole domain, which is why we'd like to stay away from having to manage custom recipients. > for just one user or just to the one external domain? > > > From: "Russell Hopkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" &

RE: Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages

to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hope this clears up our issue. Thanks. > Sure. Add the email addy to each Exchange mailbox and then set it as the > default reply-to. > > -Original Message- > From: Russell Hopkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 19,

Changing the Domain on Outbound Messages

We have a need to change the domain name on certain outbound messages (e.g., mail going out to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be readdressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). I know this can be done for inbound messages, but is there any way of accomplishing this for outbound messages on 5.5?

RE: Possible hardware issue?

Hi there Could this possibly be a DNS issue? The only reason I say this is because you're saying that if you move the people to a different server, the problem goes away. Could there be something in a HOST or LMHOST file jacking things up?? HTH Russell -Original Message-

RE: Mailbox Hacked

HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is it possible that someone Telneted into the IMC and sent the message to the Sales Manager from his boss? It's really not that ha

RE: Clustering Exchange 2000

ed by throwing this on a cluster server? HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions I remember seeing all the reasons to not cluster exchange, can someone point me to those please? T

RE: "wear a cup if you plan on posting questions"

, I've become a better admin. I know what questions to ask... and I know where to look for answers. Remember - no form of discipline is painless. Better to be chastised by the wise than to be praised by fools. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[

RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN

complex enough, why would you want to spend extra money to make it more complex? Please make sure you know what you're getting yourself into. I wish I could get a hold of the guy who talked my boss into a cluster and kick him in the ding ding! Thanks Russell -Original Message-

RE: Exchange 5.5 Directory sync across orgs

Ed, thanks for the reply, this is actually Exchange 5.5 ORG1 to Exchange 5.5 ORG2 directory sync I'm trying to get working, we're merging with two other companies each running Exchange 5.5 and we're not quite ready to go to AD and Exch 2K yet so we're trying to get some connectivity between the dif

Exchange 5.5 Directory sync across orgs

I'm trying to sync the directory of two exchange 5.5 orgs - ie. mailboxes on one become custom recipients on the other and vice versa, I've spent endless hours trying to make interorg directory sync work (the one out of BORK) but it won't play, the messages get produced and sent to the other mailb

RE: ADC connector for 5.5 - WAYYY OT

Hi All I'd like to make a change to Ed's famous line. "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems" to "You're so darn stupid there is no computer powerful enough to fix you" Thanks Russell -Original Message- From:

RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5

Hi there IE 6 - there's no anti popup software on this computer. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5 F

Unable to reply to emails in OWA Exchange 5.5

lp me?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DL Question

ROTFL!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Question It goes to email heaven Timmy. - Original Message - From: "Morgan, Joshua" <[EMAIL P

RE: Clustering Exchange

complex enough. Why would you want to introduce a cluster and complicate your environment even more? (Off soap box) HTH Russell "Friends don't let friends cluster exchange" -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2

RE: Antivirus software for exchange.

Hi there I've used NAI's Groupshield with great success. However, I wouldn't recommend Webshield. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards@;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussi

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

x27;t know what to do. I have told people once their PSTs hit 600 megs, then I'll transfer it to my machine and burn them a CD rom. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:56 AM To

RE: VPN breaks Outlook . Now: Mongo Netbios

This is easy Shut down your firewall, your proxy and run a straight T1 into the building. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida@;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VPN breaks Outlook . Now: Mongo

RE: Viruses via email

Hi there New York Life insurance. Thanks -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus pr

RE: RBL's

OOppsss I was told it was relay black list. Sorry for the misinformation. Russell -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, if you mean I convinced you th

RE: RBL's

Relay Black List -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: OWA 2000 login prompt

I'm curious - why do you ask if any of the public folders are on a cluster? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards@;watrust.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt No, None of the p

RE: E2K question

Hi Chris Thanks for the answer. I appreciate it :) Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Well, one pendantic point and one possibly not so much

RE: E2K question

Hi there OOppsss... Where did I error? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Not exactly. > -Original Message- > From: Etts, R

RE: E2K question

Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002

RE: E2K question

logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A.

RE: SMTP connector statistics in E2k

FINALLY There is someone in the world that can truly appreciate how I feel when most users call me!! THANK YOU CTHULHU JONES!! Russell PS - Did you see the new stuffed Christmas Cthulhu yet?? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday

RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering

event viewer to tell my why. If you ever have to perform a disaster recovery, the cluster is going to make the job that much more complicated Exchange is complex enough without making it more complicated by installing it on a cluster. Learn from our mistake - don't do it. HTH Ru

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2

s how to set webshield to accept mail from servers within your company. However, the instructions tell you it is not really necessary to do this. The instructions lie. The tech told me the instructions are not "clear". HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Jason Rader [mailto:[

RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2

We're using Groupshield here with no issues. Webshield, however uugghhh Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee fo

RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly

Hi there This was the information that I was looking for. I'm using the "Martin Blackstone block list" (thank you very much, BTW), and I updated the AV on Exchange. Thanks everyone for your answers Russell -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL P

RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly

Hello Can you tell me what extensions the virus uses?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Roger Haxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I've had two come in here s

RE: Exchange 5.5 upgrade to 2000 on different domains (helpl!)

Hi there One of our other divisions actually did this - they told me they used a tool from a company called NetIQ. Don't know the exact tool they used. If you need the exact name of the tool, email me offlist and I'll contact them to get all the details... HTH Russell -Origin

RE: Exchange HELL

Hi there Where are your log files? Has anyone successfully backed this machine up lately? HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange HELL I would bring up

RE: Exchange HELL

-Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange HELL I would bring up another Exchange 2000 server and move all of the mailboxes to it then blast this server and reinstall it with

RE: MEC

know how valuable I feel at this place... Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I finally got my boss to sign off on it. I will, hopefully, see you all there.

RE: Message rejected

Hi All I know I'm opening myself up to getting flamed here, but I have to ask What is "Friggin Lyris"? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subje

RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)

You're a better man than I am. After three days, being on almost every blacklist out there, and then finally cornering NAI, I found out that Webshield will successfully relay. Boy, was I annoyed!! HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Am I still a relay? (long and potentially confusing)

Hi there Just as a side note, if you're using NAI Webshield, then Webshield can be used as a relay. Just an FYI Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Am I still a

RE: Mac personal folders corrupt

Hi there Thank you so much for your assistance!! Russell -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mac personal folders corrupt See Q296142. Geoff... -Original

Mac personal folders corrupt

Hi everyone I have a user that has a MAC, using Outlook with a personal folder. The personal folder has become corrupt. I know there is a tool for fixing the file in a PC environment, but does any know about a sucvh a tool for a MAC OS?? Thanks Russell

Resource Scheduling across Exchange Organizations

box. Unable to directly book a resource for this meeting." It looks like I've completely misunderstood how resource booking occurs. This implies that the Outlook client directly opens the mailbox to the resource for booking. How does one do resource scheduling across Exchange Organization

RE: Can't move mailbox

Hi there Don't take this as "gospel truth", but there is one location that hastold me there is a tool from Net IQ that does accomplish this. You may want to over over to their website and look around. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Saunders, Jim [mailto:[

RE: IMC issues

Hi Missy Thanks for your insight and advice! Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues There's no problem letting them simply time out. Depends on how you

RE: IMC issues

l never be sent. Am I doing the wrong thing, or should I just let them time out?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMC issues Ignore them. They'll eventual

RE: Exchange 2000 Ent require Win2K Server Advanced?

x27;d be safe using Windows 2000 Server. So it's a viable alternative for small sites. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tue 8/13/20

RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K

tive interfaces, but without an installed base of Exchange 5.5, the implementation of Exchange 2K is very straightforward. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Permission Problems with Interorg Replication between Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000

he Default right to Owner and the InterOrg Sync tool started working. I'll need to tighten the rights back down, but at least I can see where the problem is. Thanks for your help. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CCNA, CNE Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ragar

Permission Problems with Interorg Replication between Exchange 5.5 and Exchange 2000

also shows that the service account from the trusted domain is the account that is failing to get the access (i.e. the override doesn't work). Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. _ List

RE: Front-End DC

Hi there If the Front End server is in same site, make sure that it is in the same subnet. If it FE server is not in the same subnet, then you need to specify the subnet in sites and services. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: KLEZ or Sleaze

Interesting I've been seeing the same thing. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Su

RE: Off Topic

Can you hold a rainbow in your arms? Can you caress a sunset? Then how can you love Mongo.. Oh wait, that's Mango. Hehehe Russell -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: CHILD DOMAIN

Hi there Is this a mixed site?? I had a similar problem when someone installed a new site connector and set the cost to 1. I set the cost to 10, stopped and started the MTA and SMTP and I found all my outbound mail, and it was all sent. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From

RE: OWA

Ohh This is getting too good!! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Wait, Jennifer! You don't understand! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consulta

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

for OWA in the DMZ that doesn't require so much internat data access and isn't based on IIS? Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri 6/7/20

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

regard costs in an engineering solution, but it has almost no practical value. Ultimately, resource allocation is the primary limiting factor in all engineering designs, so I can't ignore costs in proposing any solution. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

. It's no different than if they'd spent all day on the phone or reading a magazine. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Dis

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

Bulter's response is completely appropriate. But further, my users are highly mobile. Many telecomute. Others travel a lot and are in client sites. Internet OWA is production for us. Perhaps it's not really needed in your environment? It depends on your client base. Russell Ragar, MC

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

es. That's they way it should play out. Russell C. Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Networking Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - s

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

at's the price of using OWA on the Internet. If you don't have the money to do it securely, don't provide the service. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, J

Outlook question

;in" box. Does anyone have any ideas?? Is this really possible?? Thanks Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubsc

RE: "Bad Media"

Russell -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: "Bad Media" Has anyone seen Backup Exec 8.6 label their media as "Bad Media". They are brand new LTO tapes in a brand

RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups

ou in the right direction Russell -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need help, Exchange 2000 admin groups Thanks for the reply. I will try this between all servers. As I read the technet articl

RE: Where is everyone?

Wonderful Long Island, NY here... ...back to lurking -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Or do most Exchange admin's crawl out of bed at 1:40 pm? -Felicity

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

addresses that you host, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], then fff.com needs to be in the default recipient policy. If it's not, then OWA will not work (among other things) Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29,

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: I don't trust headquarters (OWA question)

Hi there I have had a similar problem, but with another child domain. Are all the addresses that the users are currently using in the default recipient policy?? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 2:24 PM To

RE: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU

d see if you are getting any errors in the event viewer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Yves Soriano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE running at 100% CPU Our Store service is constantly using between 90% t

RE: Exchange client problem

Hi there I know that when I create a new user, I get the error that tells me the users is not found. It does take about 15 minutes for everything to replicate. If I move a user from 5.5, it could take longer. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Other Exchange mailing lists?

27;s worth it's weight in gold :). I hope you stay. I think you'll find there is allot of very useful information here. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

Re-assigning Ownership to a Meeting Request

Is there any method of re-assigning ownership in Ex2K to a meeting request outside of deleting and recreating the request? Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ

RE: Email addressed to unrecognised recipients

If you hit the Resend button on the NDR in the admin box, you'll see the contents of the message. It's preserved. Basically, the functionality you are looking for is pretty much there. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- F

  1   2   >