RE: Clustering Exchange 2000

, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange 2000 I remember seeing all the reasons to not cluster exchange, can someone point me to those please? Thanks! :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com

RE: Clustering Exchange 2000

Hi there As a person that has a cluster exchange, let me comment: 1) You cannot run the SRS service on a cluster. 2) Microsoft highly recommends an Active - Passive setup 3) There are extra steps needed to get a front end/ back configuration to work properly 4) The cluster is much more complicate

Re: Clustering Exchange 2000

Hello Mike, You can search the archives for this list at: http://www.mail-archive.com/exchange%40ls.swynk.com/ If that link doesn't work, just go to http://www.mail-archive.com and search for 'exchange'. Regards, Allison Am Don, 2003-03-27 um 21.37 schrieb Hutchins, Mike: > I remember seeing a

Clustering Exchange 2000

I remember seeing all the reasons to not cluster exchange, can someone point me to those please? Thanks! :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesear

RE: Clustering Exchange 2000

Change the display name of the 5.5 org before upgrading and their E2K org will reflect the new name. > -Original Message- > From: Sebnem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Clustering Exchange 2000

Clustering Exchange 2000

Hi all- I am working with a client who has Exchange 5.5 single server running in their AD. They want to go for Exchange 2000 2-node active/passive clustered environment w/o any downtime. I know that I cannot upgrade an Exchange server to a clustered exchange server. My approach is to install Exch