6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi
connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I
think that..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original
And the Uranium power source?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
And the Uranium power source?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu]
Sent
concurrent users
I'll ask a Q.. on this topic
IF it is going to be that you will be able to do RPC via HTTP...
It's that kind'a wide open?
Would you want to like run it over HTTPS or still thru a VPN too kind'a keep
in secure?
bill
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson
RPC will be available in Outlook 11. Other yes still use VPN for now.
- Original Message -
From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I'll ask a Q.. on this topic
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi
connections in the range of a few hundred pre box
oooh, bad me, I didn't read back far enough.
I'm not 2k, not 5.5. :/
I'll go stand in my corner now.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
U actually I have
MSX55+SP4
1 MSXorganization
1 server
Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in
MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version?
Thanks,
-er
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
OWA concurrent users
MSX55+SP4
1 MSXorganization
1 server
Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in
MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version?
Thanks,
-er
_
List posting FAQ: http
;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
What is the setting in IIS configured for?
Otherwise... lots!
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116
I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any evidence
to support it.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Why does it stick in my
Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any
evidence to support it.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum
Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone.
--Kevinm M
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Well go find
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
It was also more fickle on IIS4 than IIS5.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I think
. But of course, the amount of resources determine the actual amount
supported.
We're all light users right?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I have
wonder
if there could be a way of preloading users laptops/desktops to have those
files?
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
According to a white
, October 21, 2002 7:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I
really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured
way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when
concurrent users
IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take.
Very nice.
IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active
server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks.
Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful
That what?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
That oh great tentacled one..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS
: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
That what?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
That oh
What have you heard...
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type
connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true?
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
, October 15, 2002
without the need for a VPN
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:19 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
What have you heard...
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
OWA concurrent users
Nope I was wrong sorry . The RPC thing had to due with Outlook version
11. Quote Other infrastructure changes in Outlook 11 and Titanium will
support RPC over HTTP so that users can connect to Exchange over the
Internet
From Exchange and Outlook UPDATE
Exchange and Outlook
: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:33 PM
Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one..
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond
-Original Message
What does the term concurrent users mean?
Does this mean a HTTP/POP3/IMAP4 user is consider the same as an MAPI user - Load
wise?
Can someone please explain what Microsoft means by concurrent users?
Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University
You have HTTP/POP3/IMAP4 users?
That's a horse of a different color, where are the Front End Servers
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:22 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Concurrent Users
Subject
So concurrent users are any user that connects to your exchange servers.
This is a one to one ratio - not dependant upon the protocol they are using to attach
to the server.
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
-Original Message
]]
Posted At: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:43 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Concurrent Users
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
So concurrent users are any user that connects to your exchange servers.
This is a one to one ratio - not dependant upon the protocol they are
using to attach
, March 13, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
Where did you read that from? Definitely not my post.
CONCURRENT=AT THE SAME TIME
HTTP/POP3/IMAP = not a standard user. Very different profile, especially
without a Front End Server.
I'd definitely have
Users
Subject: RE: Concurrent Users
Ed,
Thank you. I'm just trying to get feedback and learn. Sorry
to get you so upset.
I believe that you can go from an active/active configuration to
an active/passive. So I don't see any harm in trying an active/active
configuration
Ed,
I will keep you post on how it goes.
Do you know?
Does the MSExchangeIS-Maximum Users in perfmon, would tell max concurrent
user? Is there a counter in perfmon to tell concurrent users so I can do a log over
a 24-hr period?
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing
.
So concurrent users would be multiple users happening at the same time as
other users
- Original Message -
From: Sabo, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:21 AM
Subject: Concurrent Users
What does the term concurrent users
35 matches
Mail list logo
