Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does
the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals
remarkably well with huge databases.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
Sorry, but
D]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
(Recommended or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommende
Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exch
les, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Pet
6 matches
Mail list logo
