RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread John Matteson
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears S! A! T-U-R ! D-A-Y ! NIGHT !! -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread Jim Helfer
S! A! T-U-R ! D-A-Y ! NIGHT !! -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Rollers Rule (or at least they did in the UK in the 70's!) Bring out the tartan tro

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread QUINN, Chris
Rollers Rule (or at least they did in the UK in the 70's!) Bring out the tartan trousers! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep mov

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread LSandoval
Discussions Subject:RE: Gears I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread Joyce, Louis
13:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread Ramsay, Steve
I think a detailed explanation of how your sites hang together would make troubleshooting easier. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 February 2002 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I would agree with you however, the dir-rep

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread LSandoval
I would agree with you however, the dir-rep move was with our Corpus site. The "gears" that are showing up are all Bay City users. We have quite a bit going on in our org. The Bay City users were recently migrated out of one site into another. The Corpus site was a di

RE: Gears

2002-02-08 Thread Ramsay, Steve
I think this is all to do with your failed Dir-Rep move. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Ed Crowley
rsday, February 07, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears That's what I was thinking however, our corporate admin was making a big deal about it insisting that I clean it up. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, F

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
That's what I was thinking however, our corporate admin was making a big deal about it insisting that I clean it up. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gear

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Ed Crowley
ruary 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I tested the DL and it works fine. I also, viewed it through the OAB and the names all look right. I thought about asking the owners to clean it up however, when you view it in the OAB the icons are not shown so, they would not be

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
to leave them there like they are? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears You could do a directory import to recreate the DLs, but that would probably be more

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Ed Crowley
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Yes, another site migrated out of one site to another. I know this is probably the cause, but is there an easy way to fix it, rather than going in manually

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Andy David
Were those entries originally imported from a csv or added manually? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears I'm not sure. It was just pointed out to me that they

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
rsday, February 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a techn

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Ed Crowley
You can't post OLE objects to the list because they're attachments. But I know what you're talking about. I think that means that those particular members' objects are messed up, to use a technical term. Do those with gears receive mail sent to the list? Ed Crowley MCSE

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Andy David
That means there is no directory entry for that object. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears NO, I'm referring to the members listed on the DL. If you open t

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Tener, Richard
see joyce you love me you really do. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears After Tener Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears Actually, having said that, I cant actually find what you are talking about. All my DL's have the group symbol next to them when viewed in Exadmin. Or are you using E2k or something? R

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Joyce, Louis
ginal Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mechanism work. Rather like the DL is composed of many people. Sorry. I will

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Joyce, Louis
After Tener Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gears Can you share your crack pipe

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
Can you share your crack pipe? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Gears By design. But I suppose it's a way of showing that many cogs go to make the mech

RE: Gears

2002-02-07 Thread Joyce, Louis
or BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 February 2002 15:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gears Does anyone know why in a distribution list "gears" would appear by the name rather than t

Gears

2002-02-07 Thread LSandoval
Does anyone know why in a distribution list "gears" would appear by the name rather than the mailbox icon? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www