Re: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread John Q Jr.
. Knowing your systems are never safe. Mostly due to lusers. - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:48 AM Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office > Kevi

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Scharff
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office > > > What kind of security risk from a human engineering > standpoint do you mean? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread Daniel Chenault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office > What kind of security risk from a human engineering standpoint do you mean? > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread Steven A. Christensen
there to prevent it. Not really a risk worth taking, is it? - Original Message - From: "Andersson Mikael (SIX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office > What

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread Andy David
When you leave your house do you put out a sign that says "I'm not home and wont be back until next Saturday"? -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf O

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-22 Thread Andersson Mikael (SIX)
What kind of security risk from a human engineering standpoint do you mean? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 21 mars 2002 20:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a

Re: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread missy koslosky
hange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:23 AM Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? /micke _

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread Hunter, Lori
It can. It has. It might not ever for you, but there is a risk. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread Andy David
Which is a much better answer than mine! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Scharff
-Original Message- > From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Ouf Of Office > > > Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? > > I believed that OOF only repli

RE: Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread Andy David
OOFs reply once to a mail address until you turn it off and back on again. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet

Ouf Of Office

2002-03-21 Thread Andersson Mikael (SIX)
Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? /micke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: