RE: Better Version?

2001-10-17 Thread Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version? because 5.5 will not be supported (officially) in 2 years or less, probably muc

RE: Better Version

2001-10-17 Thread Ed Crowley
day, October 17, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version Sadly, in our situation, despite the fact that E2k is kid-tested (Me) and mother-approved (My boss), we are not going to be moving to it anytime soon simply because of the expected additional expenditures invol

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-17 Thread Ed Crowley
I can think of four compelling reasons to go to Exchange 2000. You'll have to evaluate whether they're compelling enough for you. 1. Better OWA. If OWA is important to you, E2K's OWA knocks 5.5's dead. 2. Somewhat better cluster support. For my money, however, clustering Exchange still seems

RE: Better Version

2001-10-17 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
ssage- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version Why is this a dumb question? This is a very good question, in fact. Corporations have been struggling with this questions for over a year. No less th

RE: Better Version

2001-10-17 Thread Van Huissteden, Adriaan
TED]] Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2001 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version His question is on the same lines as: "GM vs.Toyota?". The question means nothing, the only true answer he should be getting is "It depends on his local situation." I agree ther

RE: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Tristan Gayford
, but what you get back will mainly be simple answers that you cannot take much from. Remember, mileage may vary. Tris -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 08:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version Unfortun

RE: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version Unfortunately members like your seem to have enough time to sit there and type an email while you have nothing better to do... I am sure that most of us on this list are busy running around, and don't have time to type C

RE: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Chris Scharff
> -Original Message- > From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Better Version > > > Unfortunately members like your seem to have enough time to > sit there

Re: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Tony Hlabse
Best answer! Outsource your email and don't sweat about it just right a check every month. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 200

RE: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Stephen Mynhier
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 4:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version > -Original Message- > From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:06 AM > To: Exchange Discussions &g

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-19 Thread tech
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version? Biggest thing I like about E2K is the improved OWA but like so well put below. It's alot of work/money for such little in return. >

RE: Better Version

2001-10-20 Thread Ed Crowley
, 2001 3:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Better Version Best answer! Outsource your email and don't sweat about it just right a check every month. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-22 Thread Black, Nathan
... can't resist a reply see >>>> below > -Original Message- > From: tech [mailto: > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Better Version? > > > When you talk about 5.5 vs. 2k, you have to evaluate Ac

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-22 Thread Chris Scharff
> right, so we follow with the MS Easy Bake oven... As > long as you use > the Microsoft Iplanet (soon?) and use MSN for your ISP etc. > As Microsoft > becomes the Internet there is a thing red line between > "internet standards" > and "Microsoft Internet Standards". MSKerberos, is not

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-22 Thread Black, Nathan
ED]] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Better Version? > > > > >>>> right, so we follow with the MS Easy Bake oven... As > > long as you use > > the Microsoft Iplanet (soon?) and use MSN for your ISP

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-22 Thread Chris Scharff
l Message- > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:15 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Better Version? > > > > > > > >>>> right, so we follow with the MS Easy Bake ove

RE: Better Version?

2001-10-23 Thread Alverson, Thomas M.
Oh I get it. Nathan made a funny... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better Version? lol > Troll. -2 karma. > > Don't need slashdot to see where