RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-10 Thread East, Bill
x27;s stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot. Well, that's love for you. > -Original Message- > From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > >

RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
Discussions > Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) > ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > I was wondering how long it would take you to read that. [1] > > [1] I run fast. > > > > - Original Message - >

Re: ** SPAM (6.80/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
lol. Thats ok. Ive got a MessageOne TechEd shirt. Nothing can phase me. - Original Message - From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:33 PM Subject: ** SPAM (6.80/5.00) ** R

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Chris Scharff
FWIW, I disagree. :* -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Change FQDN in Ex55 Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. I think MS was recomme

Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > Keep in mind a few things Bridgeboy > > -I'm bigger than you are > -February isn't that far away > > -- > Roger D. S

RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
dy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) > ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > Move on to what? > > - Original Message - > From: "R

Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
Move on to what? - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:23 PM Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 >

RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
TECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > Well, I wish they would make up their minds! > > - Original Message - > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PR

Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
Well, I wish they would make up their minds! - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:48 AM Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 >

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:11 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email > domain and spoofing your address. > > -Original Message- &g

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:03 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. > I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but > generally, most recommendations n

RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Erik Sojka
gt; From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:43 AM > Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM > (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > >

Re: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
- Original Message - From: "Erik Sojka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:43 AM Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change

RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Erik Sojka
liam Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:49 AM > Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM > (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > > > What are

Re: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
ange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAI

RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Keith.Hanna
100:1? (we all know how often they happen) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 15:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 What are

RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread William Lefkovics
TECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread David McSpadden
) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Best practices recommend otherwise: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/ad/windows2000/plan/bpaddsgn.asp "As a best practice use DNS names registered with an Internet authority in the Active Dire

Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 > They won't authenicate through the real

RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread David McSpadden
They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name? - Original Message - From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change F

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread David McSpadden
It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and spoofing your address. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 I

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
ne 09, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. It is now writing this based upon the i

Re: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Andy David
IMO, Use a real dot com domain name for your internal network, not a .loc! - Original Message - From: "Dave Vantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:12 AM Subject: Change FQDN in Ex55 > I recently reconfigured our internal

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Dave Vantine
Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoin

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoing mail. Sander -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions