You mean aside from the fact that Diskeeper will not be able to defrag
the drive the databases are on because the database is an open file that
cannot be locked for exclusive use?
Other than that, there shouldn't be any problem with running Diskeeper
on the other drives. Log files are written seq
We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 & 2003 without incident.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Diskeeper and Exchange
Hello All:
I would like
Hi There,
Be careful if your Infromation Store is over 4gb as things live AV and
disk keep can corrupt your exchange box. Here is what I recommend:
1. Only run disk keeper after shutting off the exchange serverices
2. do an offline defrag of exchange every 3 months (to get rid of chain
corrup
If the Exchange IS databases are on their own drives (AND THEY SHOULD BE!)
then the drive / array will not become fragmented because Exchange uses
online degramentation to keep the databases tidy. Diskeeper will be useless
because the only thing that it will do is try to reassmble file fragments
i
t: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 & 2003 without incident.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lori Sagert
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Diskeeper and Exchan
neer
Gardner & White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:52 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Diskeeper and Exchange
Subject: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
To clarify, we only
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
That works fine, but I seriously doubt that you are gaining much from
it. How often does your OS drive change? Exchange tends to use
physical memory rather than the pagefile, and you don't often install
programs, or create documents and su
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
>
>
> We run it just fine here on our exchange 5.5 & 2003 without incident.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Hey all; Lori:
I run RAXCO's PerfectDisk on my servers, mostly cause it has the
capability of running ESEUTIL from a GUI, which is easier to explain to
some people rather than a command line.
But I digress.
Unless you are doing a lot of purging and expanding of your
Messa
. I had no
choice;)That's a whole other story.
Thanks again!
Lori
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Diskeeper and Exchange
Hey all; Lori:
NO!!! NEVER run any DEFAG on anything EXCHANGE.. Period. It runs it's
own defrag online.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean
Let's get this straight once and for all...
Diskeeper does a file-level defrag of the hard-drive. It does not touch what
is inside the files, just gathers the fragments together.
Exchange databases do get fragmented, but _internally_ to their structure.
Diskeeper will not touch that fragmentatio
onday, April 22, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: Diskeeper and Exchange the final word ?
> Let's get this straight once and for all...
>
> Diskeeper does a file-level defrag of the hard-drive. It does not touch
what
> is inside the files, just gathers the fragments together.
>
&g
ECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Diskeeper and Exchange the final word ?
> Let's get this straight once and for all...
>
> Diskeeper does a file-level defrag of the hard-drive. It does not touch
what
> is inside the files, just gathers the fragmen
le itself split everywhere on the partition )
JF
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: Diskeeper and Exchange the final word ?
> Daniel
tting) and not hurting performance (not enough to
be noticeable).
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Diskeeper and Exchange the final wor
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Diskeeper and Exchange the final word ?
>
>
> Thanks Glen...Good point
>
> but can Diskeeper do a good job
17 matches
Mail list logo