RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-21 Thread Bendall, Paul
:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange alias naming The one I'm working with just now uses that or SID history. I think you can use a mapping table as well but the alias field works for us. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs

RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Bendall, Paul
that these rules are followed. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 15:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias. That's the format I use all

Re: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Chris Scharff
. But I take on board that is not imperative that these rules are followed. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 15:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming The proper format for POP3 or IMAP

RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Ed Crowley
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange alias naming Thanks for the reply Chris, Well posting this message was useful in that it has questioned possibly a long held belief. I have always

Re: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Chris Scharff
that is not imperative that these rules are followed. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 15:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias

RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Ed Crowley
Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming It's fairly trivial to make them the same if that becomes a requirement no? On 1/20/03 12:24, Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some migration tools depend on it being that way for interorganizational moves, i.e., the alias being the same as the SAM

Re: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Chris Scharff
and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming It's fairly trivial to make them the same if that becomes a requirement

RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-20 Thread Ed Crowley
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming Just checking. ;) Makes one wonder why the $descriptor migration software can't key off of any field the admin chooses. On 1/20/03 16

Re: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-19 Thread Chris Scharff
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias. That's the format I use all the time, every time[1

RE: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-18 Thread Ed Crowley
Scharff Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange alias naming The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias. That's the format I use all the time, every time[1] so it doesn't matter to in the least what the format

Re: Exchange alias naming

2003-01-17 Thread Chris Scharff
The proper format for POP3 or IMAP usernames is domain/NT_ID/Mailbox_Alias. That's the format I use all the time, every time[1] so it doesn't matter to in the least what the format is, as long as it minimizes the potential ambiguity associated with logon IDs. I also never use Exchange for NNTP, as