RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-02-03 Thread Roger Seielstad
Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:59 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance > > > This topic should b

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Mellott, Bill
Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try www.efax.com You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used it for over a year without issue) and affordable. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Johnny Martinez
o: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Any Exchange-connected fax product can receive faxes and forward them to a designated Exchange mailbox. I don't know if WinFax Pro has this ability or not. We use Faxination (www.faxination.com). GFI's Faxmaker would work also

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Nunez, Danny
If you are really low volume (under 20-50 faxes a month), try www.efax.com You lose a little in-house control, but the service is reliable (I have used it for over a year without issue) and affordable. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
No I don't, but enjoy one from time to time. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
Same with ours. A single lost fax could cost us thousands of dollars. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Im with Martin It basically depends on what you do

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Tony Hlabse
He drives a Hummer too -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Mellott, Bill
fails your capacity is down 50% in uor business that would cost us huge.. bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance We do a TON of faxing. I have fax

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
We do a TON of faxing. I have fax servers and about 6 fax machines for 70 users. They are always all busy. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance You buy

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Mellott, Bill
P.S. even if you had the whole fax thing to exchange etc...you always need a good fax machine. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Thanks Bill. Good info

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
Thanks Bill. Good info. Looks like we'll stick with a traditional fax. I'm going to check out Panafax. Aaron -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Mellott, Bill
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I've got about 100 users. We need to replace our incoming fax machine. I'll have a hard time justify much more than the cost of a new fax. $1000 would be my limit. Aar

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
You buy expensive fax machines! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
That's less than a decent fax machine. I doubt you are going to find anything like that in that price range. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance I&#

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
$20 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Mellott, Bill
maybe faxination. but if GFI is too much maybe you could give us all an idea of $$$ your thinking of. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
5.5 -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Joshua R. Morgan
Are you running Exchange 2000 or Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Agreed, but too expensive

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
Agreed, but too expensive... We'd be wasting most of the features. Aaron -Original Message- From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Not an appliance but a good product

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Aaron Brasslett
: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to wr

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Brett Wesoloski
Winfax pro is pretty cheap around $100 I think. Not sure if it automatically will forward it however. If not I am sure it wouldn't take much to write a program to do it for you. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:01 AM

RE: Fax to SMTP Appliance

2003-01-31 Thread Joshua R. Morgan
Not an appliance but a good product http://www.gfi.com/ Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Fax to SMTP Appliance Hi All, We rec