What version are you on now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That doesnt make any sense. Download the file to a server running tftp.
Tftp the image to your
-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Can't upgrade to 6.0. cisco will not allow me to dl it as I only have 16mb
in my router.
Also, tom I have verified that information. Thanks.
-Original
Sorry PIX. And according to cisco and show ver I have 16mb. I would
install it but cisco wont even let me dl it off their site.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Version 5.3(5)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
What version are you on now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Sorry PIX. And according to cisco and show ver I have 16mb. I would
install it but cisco wont even let me dl it off their site.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange
Which model of the PIX do you have?
D
Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Version 5.3(5
Subject: RE: Help please
Which model of the PIX do you have?
D
Ideas pull the trigger, but instinct loads the gun. -Don Marquis
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am
beginning to think this is a proxy problem.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Router??? I
: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Its funny. I can not redirect and websites to internal servers. I am
beginning to think this is a proxy problem.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That's why I wanted you to check the logs on both Proxy and the PIX.
Somewhere there's something not passing traffic correctly...
D
Overconfidence: Before you attempt to beat the odds, be sure you can
survive the odds beating you. - - http://www.despair.com
OK, let us know what you find.
D
DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I will have to call cisco
: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes I have a cco login that's where it blocks me.
Pix 515
Web site says that it comes with 16mb but 6.0 requires 32mb
I really appreciate all the help
: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a Pix 515 that I run 6.1 on.. I thought they only shipper with 32mb
as a minimum.. You should be able
.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
OK, let us know what you find.
D
DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
When accessing the site this is what is in the proxy log
2001-12-18 15:51:12 63.17.150.119 - 172.16.1.1 80 GET
/scripts/proxy
: Help please
OK, let us know what you find.
D
DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I will have
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Logging is fairly straight forward. Telnet to device and add the following
lines
logging on
logging timestamp
logging trap errors
logging history errors
logging facility 7
: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in
the
logs when you try to pass authentication?
D
A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than
Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Is the 63.x.x.x address the client address or what? What shows up in the
logs when
Yes it is set to the server name
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Are you using an host headers on your IIS Server?
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
to a routable IP address!
D
Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. -Abraham
Lincoln
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That's all I see
Ronald,
Can you login to OWA from your internal network ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:13 AM
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes it is set to the server name
-Original
, 2001 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Ronald,
Can you login to OWA from your internal network ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:13 AM
Subject: RE
I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip
208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I think I've got
Yes internal works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Ronald,
Can you login to OWA from your internal network ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From
: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip
208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work.
Do a sh xlate at the prompt on the PIX. You should have a statically
defined Pub address that points to your priv address
18, 2001 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: Help please
I have an inside outside mapping from that ip to the public ip
208.253.38.123 which is the outside ip of the pix
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Oh.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Guys,
I don't think this is a routing problem. I can access the default web page
on tahoe.sss-cpa.com w/o any problem
Sh xlate returns
Global 208.253.38.123 local 172.16.1.1 static
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Nope, if that is the address of the PIX, it won't work.
Do a sh
Yes my bad sorry. I do and I just received ios 6.0. maybe ill do that
tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ronald, the 16MB you see is for the flash memory
to know where you're going, the hindsight to
know where you've been, and the insight to know when you've gone too far.
-Irish Toast
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes my bad sorry. I do and I just received ios 6.0. maybe ill do that
tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
, December 18, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ok, so that address is only assigned to the OWA server? Is there
anything
else in the proxy logs that might turn something up? Proxy and the PIX
are
dropping the return path or something. Does the user account ever get
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
No lockout
That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests go
to it first.
That's all the proxy logs seem to have regarding that connection.
Im setting up the pix syslog serve now.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto
Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
No lockout
That ip is the only ip associated with the proxy. All incoming requests
go to it first.
That's all the proxy logs seem to have
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the proxy
then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different then
directly
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I'm not sure I see the relevance of forwarding the ip packets to the
proxy
then to the internal server. Your not accomplishing anything different
then
directly
, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I can
use and it's the pix ip. Is it possible to map that ip in and out along
with the other statement. Your last statement was correct
(internal_ip3) 90 netmask
255.255.255.255
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I don't think I can take the proxy out of the picture I only have 1 ip I
can use
Had to install kiwi enterprise syslog. Did everythin stated but no info
is logged to the syslog server
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Logging is fairly
Conduit commands are not recommended or supported in 6.0 and above.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement
Upgrade to 6.0 first.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Had to install kiwi enterprise syslog. Did everythin stated but no info
is logged to the syslog server
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Conduit commands are not recommended or supported in 6.0 and above.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
The tcp and www statement should
in the 6.0 from that older version. We will need
to rebuild your config from scratch. No problemo.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That's right, I forgot about
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in
6.0
IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use
1
IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For
example:
Using one IP you can setup
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ahhh but the problem here is that I have web applications on 1 web server
and some on another. If I redirect them to the exchange server my other
sites will go down.
-Original Message-
From
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes. Using the static commands. I would not use conduit commands in
6.0
IOS. Use a static command like I described below. This way you can use
1
IP address to redirect different ports to different servers. For
example:
Using one IP you can
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn
Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my
config. Aren't there issues with those.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
Oh yea
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn
Hey I just noticed theres a bunch of fixup protocol commands in my config.
Aren't
18, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Oh yea
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah that's what I figured. Damn
Hey I just
: RE: Help please
The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement...
1 IP
address??? Might I ask why?
D
Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as
a
warning to others.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
:24.3.196.33/53
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
The tcp and www statement should be in a conduit permit statement...
1 IP
address??? Might I ask why?
D
Mistakes: It could
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
1 ip was all uunet would give us at the time so I was told. I just
contacted them about it and they are a pain in the arse to get ip's from
apparently.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
What is that 192.x.x.x address for?
D
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. - Ed
Crowley
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
headed until implementation of IPv6.
Is this a 3 port Pix 515? Running in a DMZ config. That would account for
the two private IP networks.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
You need to get additional IP addresses. You need one IP bound to the
external interface as your PAT Address only. You need additional IP's
for
services with duplicate ports running on different servers. Or, you
Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I am going to look for info right now on the port change for owa. My 1
problem is if I add a statement static inside outside with port 90
I owe you all one.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
The SMTP fixup is the most known problem. There are others that you may
not
need though...
D
The secret to success
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Ok guys heres a few developments. I already have 3 ips available I did
not even know about. According to uunet that is. So now I just need to
come up with a static map statement and re think how exchange is set up
to retrieve mail and I should
that I have but one life to lose for my country. -Nathan
Hale
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Keep the fixups and disable esmtp on the exchange server
Just partial to google. Try and see.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Just partial to google. Try and see.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you wouldn't
imp through another subnet. I would assume the proxy will just
pass it along.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you
, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
And I would not use the M$ indicator... :P
As to why you wouldn't search the MS Site, what are you talking about?
One
query, got three responses...
I liked this one for his purpose if he disables ESMTP...
http
You cannot ping through a pix. You would have to add a ICMP any any to your
ACL.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Well the solution I created is nto going
proxy
external
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
You cannot ping through a pix. You would have to add a ICMP any any to
your
ACL.
-Original Message
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Well the solution I created is nto going to work. You can map inside
out through the proxy to another net. It has no idea where to go..
figured this put because the pix can not ping the exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL
: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send
straight
to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box.
ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box.
This box should have one nic. I'm assuming
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah. I specifically stated not to map to your proxy first. Send straight
to the 192.168.x.x of the OWA Box.
ALso, you need to modify a few things on this box.
This box
That's a problem. Read previous mail.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I think we are missing something. There is no possible way to not go
through proxy
, December 18, 2001 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
That's a problem. Read previous mail.
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I think we
: RE: Help please
Your making this harder then it needs to be.
The PIX is your Firewall...not the proxy. Proxy is basically being used to
Authenticate Internet Access to internal users.
Your Proxy, Exchange Server, and OWA server, etc should be pointing
directly to your PIX Firewall
though?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
It sounds like your PIX is configured wrong. Your proxy is configured
wrong
for this config too. The center point
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
VBG
I've given up. I feel like charging him now. What he really needs is a
consultant. ;o)
D
Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1
Double check your relaying settings in the IMC; sometimes when you change
things (like domains) the settings may have gotten off kilter and you may
have become an open relay.
David
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:06 PM
To:
Bcc
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help: User recieving SPAM
Greetings
Can you log in via OWA on the internal network?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect users
to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works
even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you clarify redirect my MX record
exchange server address to the server?
Also...
How many valid static
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Upgrade to version 6.0 IOS. Use the Static Port commands to redirect
users
to the internal OWA site instead of your Proxy Server first. This works
even if your using a DMZ card. Also, can you
Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah sorry. My mx record is exchange.domain.com. when a user
enters exchange.domain.com/exchange they hit the proxy.
Proxy is set up to redirect any requests for this address to
the internal exchange address. This is as per M$.
-Original
check to see if they have logon locally rights
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though?
Chris
--
Chris
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
If they do http://server/exchange internally it works though?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original
Authenticated users have log on locally. Domain users do not.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Tillett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
check to see if they have logon locally rights
-Original
Who is M$?
D
Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met on the
street. -Elbert Hubbard
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yeah sorry. My
: RE: Help please
Yes I forgot to say if they do that internally it works
Also I have open tcp and udp any any on the firewall to se if it was a port
issue and it had the same result. Thanks so much guys. I'm almost ready to
cal M$ but then, no one learns anything.
-Original Message-
From
I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle
dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 11:33 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Subject: RE: Help please
I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle
dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 11:33 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
: RE: Help please
I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle
dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 11:33 a.m.
To: Exchange Discussions
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
1. Your MX record has no bearing on the issue - that's solely for mail
routing. You need to worry about where your A record (or CNAME if
that's how you're doing it) points.
2. I'm still kind of waiting for you to say that you've followed
Q276388
Administrative share on the M:\ drive.
Duh. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Who is M$?
D
Many a man's reputation would not know his character if they met
(DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle
dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely
Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Yes that article has been followed to the letter. I apologize for the ms
reference so could we get back to this. It is becoming increasingly
frustrating. It SHOULD work
I think I said that I tried opening tcp and udp any any on the pix and
it had no effect. I would believe this would eliminate the pix.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
. If
I remember correctly internaly users can access OWA, yes ?
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM
Subject: RE: Help please
Have you turned up syslog on your PIX to watch
: Help please
I think I said that I tried opening tcp and udp any any on the pix and it
had no effect. I would believe this would eliminate the pix.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
://www.despair.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Ronald,
If your external address for your owa is tahoe.ss-pca.com/exchange then you
have an authentication problem
.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: Help please
That's another theory too... However, on the PIX there are some strange
occurrences that would not pass some HTTP traffic
There is no M: Drive
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help please
Administrative share on the M:\ drive.
Duh. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto
when we don't know what to do. -John Holt
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Help please
Don,
I'm not too familiar with PIX but I know the problem with esmtp and pix ,
but never
301 - 400 of 479 matches
Mail list logo