RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-05 Thread Ken Cornetet
d? I don't remember ever coming across it in any of the migration papers. -Original Message- From: Marc MEshurle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! I am running into the same problem. Have a

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Ed Crowley
, February 02, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! I am running into the same problem. Have a W2K Ad setup running MSX5.5sp4. Installed a new server W2K adv svr and installed E2K adv srv. According to tech docs, I need to have a two way AD connector in my MSX5.

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Marc MEshurle
Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: I'm confused now! > > > Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 > d

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Ed Crowley
cCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now!

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Adam Romain
e ( 1 NT4.0 BDC with ex5.5 and 1 win2k ADS with ex5.5 ) with the intention to decommission the BDC to have 1 server being win2k/ex2k. Ta, Adam -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 16:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm co

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Ed Crowley
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Not at all. Still, I'm learning the hard way (due to go on course in a few weeks though) What I was trying to get at is that you need to ensure tha

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-04 Thread Adam Romain
ex2k' from the pre-requisites section. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Ed Crowley
, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Of course. What I meant was: do I need to upgrade my EXCHANGEX NT4 domain (where the MSX 5.5 server lives) to mixed-mode AD and install the E2K server in the EXCHANGEX domain (now AD) before I can join the MSX5.5 org and

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Ken Cornetet
Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Your Exchange 2000 server CANNOT be in your NT 4.0 domain because it must be in an Active Directory domain. I can tell that this quest

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Brian Meline
Andy, and Ed from a severed thread, are right. E2K does NOT need to be in native mode to join a 5.5 domain. Our network did it: joined 5.5, moved mailboxes, replicated public folders [but that's a long story], served users from the new server for mail and public folders, got OWA going with mailbox

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Andy David
Sure about that? -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your d

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Bloom, Tom
e are lot more steps and preparations, but that's the basic scheme. Things worked fine. Tom -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Ed Crowley
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Romain Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -O

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Ed Crowley
ruary 01, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called "EXCHANGEX". I'm wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii). I want to join the E2K to the MSX 5.5 org and site so

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Adam Romain
Exchange 2k can only run one there is at least one win2k server running in Native mode in your domain. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 February 2002 17:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! My existing MSX 5.5 server

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Ken Cornetet
XCHANGEX domain? Please tell me it doesn't have to be... -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I'm confused now! Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean al

RE: I'm confused now!

2002-02-01 Thread Walt Brannon
Mixed mode includes 5.5 servers too. I guess they mean all the 5.5 servers must be running the same SA. Walt >-Original Message- >From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM >To: Exchange Discussions >Subject: I'm confused now! > >I mean even