RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread Scott Perley-TM
Ahh. Thanks very much everyone. I'm not going nuts. (at least not in this instance.) Scott -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect? Remember that the 10MB

RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread Couch, Nate
Remember that the 10MB limit refers to the message size AFTER conversion to SMTP formatting. Hence, if you have a 10MB file BEFORE conversion it will be over your IMS limit AFTER conversion. Nate Couch EDS Messaging > -- > From: Scott Perley-TM > Reply To: Exchange Discussio

RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread PRamatowski
Man, that sounds ::painful:: -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect? The encoding process when sending attachments adds about a 25% overhead to a file. I&#

Re: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread Daniel Chenault
At least a 25% overhead. Andy Webb did some testing on this. - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:42 AM Subject: RE: IMS Limits incorrect? >

RE: IMS Limits incorrect?

2001-08-20 Thread Martin Blackstone
The encoding process when sending attachments adds about a 25% overhead to a file. I'm not sure if the IMS takes that into account. You might try setting the limit at 13MB and see if you can pass a 10MB file then. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Be