n?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:11 PM
> > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
> > - the mos
mbolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is
>irrelevant.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-m
Dumb-ass? ...here I thought you guys were starting to like me:)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra
ctical solution
Cool word.
Jim H
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most
pra ctical solution
>From tombola, a lottery drum. Random cha
technical prowess have a
> tombolian intersection in my experience, and thus your quandary is
> irrelevant.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> >
tombolian?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most
pra ctical solution
I
Psychometrics, psychometrics, psychometrics!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -
> the most p
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -
> > the most pra ctical solution
> >
> >
> > Shouldn't you be s
It was moider, I tell ya!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:14 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -
> the most pra ctical solution
>
>
om: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:05 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -
> > the most pra ctical solution
> >
> >
> > Shouldn't you be sending
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
> - the most pra
> > ctical solution
> >
> > You talk purty.
> >
> > > -Original Me
employees - the most pra
> ctical solution
>
> You talk purty.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail mes
You talk purty.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -
> the most pra ctical solution
>
>
> I
ECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees - the most pra
> ctical solution
>
> Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other
> purpose than t
hough, I'd probably use a 3rd party
gateway or upgrade to E2K and write an event sink to 553 the message.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Kill n
Michael's answer is a typical smart-ass response that serves no other
purpose than to intentionally humiliate the questioner.
I don't believe a familiarity of initials necessarily constitutes knowledge
of a subject. Would it have been so difficult for you to write,
"Distribution List"?? No, I s
16 matches
Mail list logo
