Absolute madness last night.
I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain names, some
how EVERY single email address for EVERY single recipient in the whole
organisation had there email address wiped, all that remained was the
X400 addresses.
What gives?
Mailing List
Conversation: Multiple domains.
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Absolute madness last night.
I was making the new policys which include the legacy domain
names, some how EVERY single email address for EVERY single
recipient in the whole organisation had there email address
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Because you made a policy that actually applied to EVERY single
recipient that told it to do that. Any new policy you make will be
assigned a higher priority than your default policy, and will overwrite
it for the recipients that the query that it's based upon
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Okay, let me get this straight I think there is a problem with
terminology between us, mostly on my behalf because I'm
How about using the Black Hole DL trick instead?
Create a Distribution Group with no members, add the no longer valid SMTP
addresses to this group, then hide the group from the Exchange address
lists.
The emails will come in and disappear w/o generating a NDR.
- Original Message -
From:
The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they
just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all
those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at
that point.
-Original Message-
I never thought that adding the domain names to Address Space and checking
allow relaying to these domains would make Exchange think that these are
local domains. I only use recipient policies to anchor domains as local.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
the policy thing, look into how to make it apply to nobody.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 16:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
I never thought that adding the domain names to Address Space and
checking
allow
Please point me in the right direction if you could, after I have made
the Policy, what says who it applies to?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
The recipient policy doesn't
leave it blank. Or create a query that won't find anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Please point me in the right direction if you could, after I have made
you mean?
Im using exchange 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 16:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
leave it blank. Or create a query that won't find anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody
on the General page, there is a button called [Filter rules]
you could just ignore that button.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Im at a loss again here.
I create
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do not come from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of postmaster@(default recipient
policy)?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
The recipient policy
http://victori.hypermart.net/rpm.html
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:31 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Multiple domains.
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do
14 matches
Mail list logo