Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 14:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From Field
Nope. By the rules (RFC 2821), all non delivery messages are to have null
from addresses - <>, in order to indicate to the mailer daemon that if it
can't be deliver
ity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:45 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR From Field
>
>
> I can see to whom it was sent so can fwd if necessary . If
> the rfc states that
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 October 2002 18:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From Field
The NDR should look something like:
---
The original message was received at Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:26:43 GMT
The NDR should contain the original message to tell you to whom it was sent.
NDRs are required to have null <> sender addresses.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> ---
ministrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:StevensMD@;oro.doe.gov]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NDR From Field
>
>
>
> I hav
I have seen that and I assumed it was a bcc.
Dave Stevens
-IT Network Support-
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
865-576-8898
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From
6 matches
Mail list logo