Two is the number that indicates a problem. But not sure it applies to MTA
- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: No originator messages
Our outbound queue
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
And the yellow bar worries you? Exchange can handle a huge queue quite
nicely. Ignore the queues unless nothing (and I do mean nothing) is moving.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: No originator mesages
I know this has been talked about
Well, I don't know. I don't want to and that's why I was asking how not
to.
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To:
What systems are in the path to your Exchange Server and what version of
Exchange is it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
. For more recently dead addresses I have rules in
my admin mailbox to delete the NDRs.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
Well, I don't know. I don't
Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
Well, I don't know. I don't want to and that's why I was asking how not
to.
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From
Used Exchange much?
On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karon Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:19 AM
To:
yes, am i missing something? I've been up all day.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
Used Exchange much?
On 1/22/03 13
, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
Used Exchange much?
On 1/22/03 13:13, Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you accepting mail for nonexistent recipients?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was
accepting.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
Exchange accepts
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
and refuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is what I think she was
accepting.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, January 22, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
What we really need is a separate set of retry options for NDR's. Have it
try an NDR once or twice and then give up without notifying your of its
failure to deliver the NDR (instead of the normal retry
for real
mail).
TOm
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: No originator messages
Charles,
I think what Chris is trying to say is, that's what an NDR is...REFUSING
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
Why do we need this?
On 1/22/03 15:06, Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we really need is a separate set of retry
Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: No originator messages
Why do we need this?
On 1/22/03 15:06, Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we really need is a separate set of retry
, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: No originator messages
Because I watch the yellow bar on the performance monitor (outbound IMC)
to make sure it isn't too big. Sometimes it indicates a real problem
sending normal mail and other times it just shows that some spammer just
sent us a whole bunch of bad emails
17 matches
Mail list logo
