RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-10 Thread Mark Jeremy
est email format out there - barnone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of East, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. In addition to the other objections raised,

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Ed Crowley
lf Of Mark Jeremy Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text is the most basic and standard format that *ANY* email client can read. Any other platform (Linux, sun, Atari (j/k), etc.) would not be able to read RTF

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread East, Bill
rint. -- be - MOS > -Original Message- > From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Can anyone think of arguments against using html

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Walden H. Leverich III
profound.) -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I think that plain text is the w

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
D]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. > > > I try not to look at anyone else's briefs. > > - Original Message - > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Dupler, Craig
Each had its own purpose, time and place. Most people that I know, use them all. It is common for Exchange Server users with the heavy Outlook client to set their default to RTF and use the others on an as needed basis. You do understand that under the hood, this is a silly question. Body part

Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Scharff
minimum hassle. But I'm dealing with 200 attorneys that like to ask why? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/0

Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Chenault
Plain text because any mail client in the world can read it. - Original Message - From: "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:02 AM Subject: Opinions on the best message format. Hi, I wanted to get the

Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Allison M. Wittstock
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 9:07 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Plain text. > > On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi,

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Charles Marriott
It's common law. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darrin J. Carter Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. Can anyone think of arguments against using ht

Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Andy David
I try not to look at anyone else's briefs. - Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. &g

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Roger Seielstad
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 12:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Opinions on the best message format. > > > Can anyone think of arguments against using html or RTF? Personally I > think that plain text is the way to go because of

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Darrin J. Carter
ry 09, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Opinions on the best message format. Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RT

Re: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Chris Scharff
Plain text. On 1/9/03 10:02, "Darrin J. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I wanted to get the groups opinion on the best message format to use in Outlook 98. Text/HTML or RTF. Any pros or cons regarding the types would be most helpful. The backend is Exchange 2000 with SP3. _

RE: Opinions on the best message format.

2003-01-09 Thread Randal, Phil
Plain text. Nothing more, nothing less. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 09 January 2003 16:03 > To: Exchange Discussions >