ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local
Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connecti
, October 30, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question
If you can't add SBS to a domain
Can you add a SBS as a controller to SBS
If it's only one controller there is no redundancy
If yes, Can you add a regular W2K server as a controller to SBS
-Origin
on,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Question
You're correct. SBS can not be added to an existing domain. It must be the
one and only domain controller.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Network Adminis
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Quick Question
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local
Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
doma
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, at 10:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1- How this can be when AD works on domain.local
Email addresses in Exchange do not have to have any connection to your AD
domain. I usually just add the Internet domain as an SMTP address, and make
it the "primary" address.
> 2- shou
ns
Subject: RE: Quick question -- -domainprep and forestprep necessary for
2nd e2k server install?
This usually occurs when you run the install and are not one of the
accounts listed with "full exchange administrator" permissions. Right
click on the organization and choose delegat
This usually occurs when you run the install and are not one of the
accounts listed with "full exchange administrator" permissions. Right
click on the organization and choose delegate permissions. See what
account is listed and be sure you are using that account to do the
install.
Also, there is
Well, is the error message suggesting the situation that you are in?
Are you trying to upgrade another Exchange 5.5 server in a different
site than your existing AD/E2K implementation? Usually, if you are
setting up the second E2K box into the same AD forest and same Domain as
the first E2K is in,
ssions
Subject: RE: Quick question...
Indeed. I knocked up a script to remind me weekly of the size of
Badmail, and I've put it up here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/dealing_with_ba.html
It wouldn't be too difficult to make it automatically delete the
cont
You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder. Besides you
probably can't anyway since they are in use. Are they of large size and
maybe taking a little while to be sent? The badmail you can safely
delete.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 06 August 2003 17:32
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question...
Subject: RE: Quick question...
You might not want to delete the ones in the queue folder. Besides you
probably can't anyway since they are in use. Ar
Thanks Ed - that answers my question
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store.
Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all
I thought Exchange 2000 supported online backup of the KMS.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 26 March 2003 15:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question re backup
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
Do not back up M
Do not back up M: as it can corrupt the store.
Do not back up exchsrvr\*data directories as all the data those
directories is transient or the files are open. The only exception is
exchsrvr\kmsdata (if you use it), which you can only back up
successfully if you shut down the Key Management Server
exchange or is it say file and rpint too.???
2 cents
bill
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
How big are the stores?
-Original Message
How big are the stores?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am backing up the but not or the drive then there is no point in backin
The worms of that sort don't stop at the first address. You'd have to add n
bogus addresses, then the hackers write it to address n+x, so you add n+x,
then they do N+x+y. Lather, rinse, repeat. It's false security.
Tell the user to let you do your job and stop telling you how to do it.
- Ori
I haven't had a problem writing a VFP program that uses Outlook
automation to send emails to everyone in an address book even when the
!000 and other hoax prevention methods were used. If I can do it, I'm
sure a virus writer can do it.
Get the Outlook security update from MS - that will at least
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question
This just came up yesterday..try this site:
http://www.vmyths.com/hoax.cfm?id=263&page=3
-Original Message-
From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
First, decide whether your job description involves fulfilling the
uninformed whims of this particular user. After that's decided, figuring
out what to do will be easy.
I once had a user that _insisted_ that the "I love You" virus was
modyfying the links on her Pagemaker documents and ch
:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick question
Yesterday someone posted a link to a website that states that this doesn't
work. Look in the archives.
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Friday,
Yesterday someone posted a link to a website that states that this doesn't
work. Look in the archives.
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:18 AM
>>>To: Exchange Discussions
>>>Subject: Quick question
>>>
>>>
>>>
from nai:
The ! Hoax is mainly circulating in the Netherlands. The e-mail content
contains a "trick" how to prevent/stop mass-mailing routines used by e-mail
viruses/worms. Basically the idea mentioned is to use a dummy ! e-mail
contact address, so without an actual associated e-mail addr
This just came up yesterday..try this site:
http://www.vmyths.com/hoax.cfm?id=263&page=3
-Original Message-
From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question
Stupid question of the day.
I have a us
This was bought up yesterday. Check the archives for some good responses. I
think the subject line was 'Probably a hoax but not sure'.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Exchange-List [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
25 matches
Mail list logo
