Re: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Daniel Chenault
: "King, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Remote Site Question > There is a T1 terminated, but it is not live... yet.. > > -Original Message- > From: Danie

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Mellott, Bill
Here's what I might do stuck with poor management as you are. Find a ISP who supports modem bonding. Get yourself a Netopia R2020 (it has two built in modems) it is a router with NAT/DHCP..etc... Set up the R2020 to dial up DOD to the ISP an set it up to do modem bounding...then setup these new

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Kevin Miller
: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Site Question If it's a failed dot.com what did they do for connectivity previously? - Original Message - From: "King, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Martin Blackstone
AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Site Question Given the current operational parameters the objectives cannot be met. That's not to say that with additional details a solution couldn't be found but... Have you seen the SBC ads where the guy is pouring sugar into his coffee c

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Chris Scharff
Given the current operational parameters the objectives cannot be met. That's not to say that with additional details a solution couldn't be found but... Have you seen the SBC ads where the guy is pouring sugar into his coffee cup until it is overflowing and mumbling about magical bandwidth faerie

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Martin Blackstone
]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Site Question All that I know about the remote location is an address... I have been told next to nothing and it is really pissing me off. How the hell am I supposed to come up with a professional solution with

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread King, John
There is a T1 terminated, but it is not live... yet.. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Site Question If it's a failed dot.com what did they do for connect

Re: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Daniel Chenault
If it's a failed dot.com what did they do for connectivity previously? - Original Message - From: "King, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: Remote Site Question > Hello all, > > I am stuck trying to fi

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread King, John
ril 01, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Site Question How many analog lines do you have in the remote location? A T1 takes about a month, so I wouldn't put to much into this. How about a couple of Earthlink accounts to dial in and the users can POP or

RE: Remote Site Question

2002-04-01 Thread Martin Blackstone
How many analog lines do you have in the remote location? A T1 takes about a month, so I wouldn't put to much into this. How about a couple of Earthlink accounts to dial in and the users can POP or IMAP their mail down? -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent