RE: Spamassassin - Good?

2003-03-28 Thread John Strongosky
We are using a version of it called Pure Message from Active State and are pleased so far. -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamassassin - Good? Hello, I would be grateful to hear anyo

RE: Spamassassin - Good?

2003-03-28 Thread Yanek Korff
I added SpamAssassin to our existing FreeBSD/postfix mail relay last year and have been fairly pleased with it. If you go *nix, I can provide a little patch which adds the spamassin report to the BOTTOM of the E-Mail instead of the top so that HTML messages aren't destroyed. In addition, if yo

RE: Spamassassin - Good?

2003-03-28 Thread Paul Hutchings
Currently running our mail through it on a Redhat box built as per http://advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html First impressions are that it was easier than expected (as someone who knows jack about Linux) to setup, and seems very accurate. It's very easy to port it to win32, but AF

RE: Spamassassin - Good?

2003-03-28 Thread King, John
I have been using spam assassin on a linux platform since February with much success. It is easy to configure and works very well. I recently upgraded to the newest version which adds functionality to preserve the original message. This is a big plus when dealing with false positives. Some of t

RE: Spamassassin - Good?

2003-03-27 Thread William Lefkovics
Sure, it is good. It's imperfect like all the rest, but certainly can be a good choice for some companies. Unfortunately McAfee acquired Deersoft in January, so the Exchange integrated version is sure to be doomed to mediocrity. http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/other/jump/deersoft.asp http://www.mcafeeb2b