.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: Stand-by servers
> Wow 150 sites... I remember when Merrill Lynch reached 212 sites
Wow 150 sites... I remember when Merrill Lynch reached 212 sites and
Directory Replication stopped working. Turned out that 212 was a design
limit. Of course Microsoft fixed it since.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:45 AM
To:
sions
Subject: RE: Stand-by servers
I think you should build these servers with new names and create new
X.400 connectors to each of the hub sites but with higher costs than the
X.400 connectors to the primary hub site. Leave them online all the
time. Then if the primary hub site goes away, Exc
Perhaps configure them into the network with a full set of connectors
identical to the the existing hub, but set the cost on the new connections
to 100 (use when the other connectors are not availalbe)?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 30 Ma
I think you should build these servers with new names and create new
X.400 connectors to each of the hub sites but with higher costs than the
X.400 connectors to the primary hub site. Leave them online all the
time. Then if the primary hub site goes away, Exchange will
automatically reroute via
5 matches
Mail list logo
