RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-15 Thread Presley, Steven
--- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:07 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: R

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-15 Thread Roger Seielstad
--- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > &g

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-15 Thread Chris Scharff
, August 15, 2003 12:07 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). I have to admit that Trend does tend to be the better product out there (from what I have heard and seen). I know Groupshield at a VERY intimate level (more then I would

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-15 Thread Steve
I have to admit that Trend does tend to be the better product out there (from what I have heard and seen). I know Groupshield at a VERY intimate level (more then I would like to admit on this list) and I would recommend staying away from it personally. One thing to point out about Trend (and any

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Blackstone
Quality plays no part in the choice. Its all cost driven. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). Tried that argument but unfortunately

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Paul Hutchings
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:56 PM Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > Tried that argument but unfortunately, they won't accept that as a valid > reason. > > -Original Me

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Scott Force
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > > original issue = it sucks eggs > > - Original Message - > From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Excha

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Andy David
original issue = it sucks eggs - Original Message - From: "Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > Scot

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Scharff
ot;Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > > Scott, > > What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield > versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to > GroupShi

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)
Tried that argument but unfortunately, they won't accept that as a valid reason. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). original issue = it sucks

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe)
Scott, What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to GroupShield to save money since we have a site license for the campus that includes Exchange. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailt

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Scott Force
Thanks guys, I'll give them a look also. If I go the way of Antigen, are there any undocumented "features" I should look out for? > Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a > compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari > Antigen implement

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Erik Sojka
Over dialup? > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). > > > I'll second that. > > -Original

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Aaron Brasslett
I'll second that. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). I like Antigen Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Ori

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Chris Scharff
Trend is still a fine product (especially if a suite purchase is a compelling bullet point), but for my shop personally I'm advocating a Sybari Antigen implementation to coincide with our next infrastructure upgrade. IMO FWIW YMMV > From: "Scott Force" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Exchange D

RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

2003-08-14 Thread Morgan, Joshua (Greenville)
I like Antigen Joshua Morgan AIMCO W. 864 239-1015 -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it