Re: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway

2003-02-09 Thread Missy Koslosky
I've never seen a reason to set these to anything but the defaults. Missy - Original Message - From: "Tim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:28 PM Subject: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway A survey: Ho

RE: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway

2003-02-07 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
default settings -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undeliverable Reattempt Period at SMTP Gateway A survey: How many days to you have your smtp gateway servers (wexchsrvr or otherwise) s

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-30 Thread East, Bill
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Undeliverable > > > Do you really want to do that? I wouldn't bring it down to a > few hours.

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-30 Thread Tristan Gayford
ions Subject: RE: Undeliverable Do you really want to do that? I wouldn't bring it down to a few hours. As far as I know the accepted standard is 48 hours, bare minimum is 24 hours, since SMTP tends to have amongst the lowest precedence on the internet. -Original Message- From: Ne

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-30 Thread Andrea Coppini
ECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undeliverable Internet Mail Service / Connections tab / Time-outs button. Neil -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 30 August 2002 00:56 Posted To: Swynk Exchange

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-29 Thread Neil Hobson
just received an Undeliverable notification re an external e-mail that was sent 3 days ago. I'm just wondering where the settings for the delivery timeout and notifications are buried. I'd like to set notifications re undeliverable e-mail to alert users within a couple of hours of delivery fa

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-21 Thread Bashir Malekzada
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Undeliverable How about Q274638? Are you sure the remote server isnt generating this message? They can be a bit misleading at times. RFC 1893 defines x.7.1 as "Delivery not

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-21 Thread Great Cthulhu Jones
What does your email administrator say? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bashir Malekzada Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Undeliverable I am getting a whole bunch of NDR's recently mostely smt

RE: Undeliverable

2002-08-20 Thread Andy David
How about Q274638? Are you sure the remote server isnt generating this message? They can be a bit misleading at times. RFC 1893 defines x.7.1 as "Delivery not authorized, message refused". -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20,