l Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 DL's
I really don't know that you have to put all that bother into it with
sub-ou's of ou's, and such. Afte
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 2000 DL's
Ok, basically we currently have a co-existence of exchange 5.5 and 2000. The
5.5 side has something like 1400 DL's ranging from 'all at location' to
z, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: exchange 2000 DL's
Ok, basically we currently have a co-existen
MAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: exchange 2000 DL's
You don't even need to have it be a security group. W2K also supports the
cr
You don't even need to have it be a security group. W2K also supports the
creation of "distribution" groups. These would only be intended for such
things as Distribution Lists, as you cannot assign permissions to them, or
rather use them to. Once you have E2K installed, you then mail-enable the
5 matches
Mail list logo