RE: best linux av?

2003-07-07 Thread Fyodorov, Andrey
I have been using Sybari Antigen realtime and don't see any burden, even with 3,000 very active users per server. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best linux av? Yes,

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-06 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
this is the conclusion that i've come to, either that or kill some users -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July 2003 04:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: best linux av? Get a bigger box! Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-05 Thread Smith Joseph
Subject: RE: best linux av? Yes, I see your point, although I'd hope my desktop AV would catch this stuff before it reaches the exchange server. What I don't like is the burden of a realtime scan on exchange. Perhaps a combination of gateway scanning, nightly mailbox scans and realtime

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
> Sent: 04 July 2003 16:09 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > Nope, wrong. Once again you're assuming that all your > desktops are happily protected and working fine, in fact that > every link in the chain is in place and secure. With vi

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Randal, Phil
PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:50 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > Yes, I see your point, although I'd hope my desktop AV would > catch this > stuff before it reaches the exchange server. > > What I don't like is the burden

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
sufficient. > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:45 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > Do you really think that the *ONLY* possible way a virus can > get into your Exchange env

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Jason Clishe
it out to your customers. Jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > why? >

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Randal, Phil
: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > why? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:21 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > &

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
why? > -Original Message- > From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:21 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > It is absolutely essential that you have virus protection on > your Exchange servers, over

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Jason Clishe
n, Daniel > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > Well, the linux products do file blocking etc so I don't any difference, > apart from freeing up tons of CPU cycles on the exchange box and seeing > less > of t

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
I though scanmail works on the IMS, not the MTA? Forgive my ignorance if not... > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 15:08 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > Yes, but if (assuming

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Paul Hutchings
twork Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 14:56 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > Wel

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
ROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 14:19 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: best linux av? > > > I'm kind of in a similar position, I just can't help but > think that whatever you have at the gateway there's a bit of > added reassurance having something l

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Paul Hutchings
8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 13:08 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: best linux av? > > > just wondering if anyone has a favourite AV scanner for linux > with post

RE: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Paul Hutchings
rator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 July 2003 13:08 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: best linux av? > > > just wondering if anyo

Re: best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread mike dilworth
i prefer using MILTER on sendmail and then choose your own command line based unix AV solution. mike - Original Message - From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 3:08 PM

best linux av?

2003-07-04 Thread Atkinson, Daniel
just wondering if anyone has a favourite AV scanner for linux with postfix as the mta? our trend renewal is coming up and i'm thinking i'd like to remove the CPU burden of AV scanning from the exchange box and put it on our linux relay which also does the spam filtering. thanks dan. _