Take a look at Siegfried's site www.cdolive.com. There's a script there that
will do exactly this.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 January 2002 19:27
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Public Folder Message
I am redoing my PF
Yes. Messages were replied to about 2 days ago.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook message icons not changing
Did he/she close the message in question BEFORE
Thanks for the reply. I did try the bcc option but if you click on the
recipients name it resolves to the correct name - i.e. if John Smith is in
the TO: when you click on it you get the properties for John Smith. In my
case, when you click on the name it resolves to Dave Jones. When I
I have noticed that
since installing Exchange 2000 SP2, my OWA users have complained about opening
word docs that are attached. After clicking the attachment, they are asked to
log in a second time (for each file they try to open). is there a way to fix
this?
Thanks!
Joe Irvine The
When you create a DL in the GAL you can select an Owner of the DL. This
owner will be able to make changes to the DL. Just make this user the
owner of the DL and they can do to all by himself.
Larry Manno
3RD Level Backoffice Support
Phone: 813-978-6531
Pager: 813-216-1086 pin 1821284
EMail:
I've run Exchange 5.5 on Win2K server for about 18 months now. It runs very
well and seems to be very stable.
-Jim
Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com
We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior
One of our users has a problem with meeting requests. they can send them
fine but when they get the message back saying whether or not the user has
accepted it shows all of the details as text rather than the buttons etc..
Has one of the forms being corrupted
NTWS6a, Outlook 2000 sr1,
I've been using this configuration for 3 months so far. Everything has been
rather smooth (except the CA Etrust InnculateIT mail option freezing the
whole thing). Other than that, the server is very stable.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
I'm running OWA (Exchange 5.5 version) aon a W2k server. The system locks
up for no reason (checked Event Viewer and IIs logs). The only fix is a
reboot, which is a pain at 2am.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exch 55 on W2K is better than NT4 any day of the week.
BTW, Uninstall the SMTP service!
-Original Message-
From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Success (or failure) running Exch 5.5. on W2k
I
That is what I am trying to set up. The instant messaging in Exch 2K. I have
the Exch set up and people can log into it. They just can't send messages to
each other.
PS... Sorry about the 2x posting the first one must have gotten lost in
cyber space for a couple of days
TIA (again)
Title: RE: Outlook/Exchange
We have a developer who had written a program that runs in
UNIX (Of which I know nothing about) to monitor specific things on our imaging
system and page one of us fortunate systems folks for specific errors on
the system. He also wants to provide us with a
Shauna, I think you are confusing people with the term IMS.
Many of us eqate that with Internet Mail Service.
-Original Message-
From: Shauna Ryall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: IMS
That is what I am
Hope someone out there can help!!
I am running exchange2000 on my corp network,no problem there everyone
sends receives mail fine.
I have been asked to include our retail stores to our exchange server.
I have been able to pop mail for the retail stores, but not use the
information store for
I'd like to get a expert advice on how to setup front-end server and a
back-end server. I already have exchange 2000 correctly configured and I
would like to put Outlook Web Access on another machine. Can someone tell
me how to do this? Maybe give me knowledge base links and other
It's all here:
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2KFrontBack.
asp
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL
You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise edition of
exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try microsoft.com/exchange
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log
files onto a different physical harddrive when exchange is already setup
as a production state. I have read that if the log files are separated
with the database files, backup recovery will not work. Besides that, are
Get the ows 200 disk. Install just OWA from the disk setup. You are up and
running.
ellery july
phone - 651-225-3895
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: front end servers
You run the Exchange Optimizer. Let it move the files for you. It does
quite a nice job of it.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM
To:
Eh?
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 January 2002 17:03
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation:
How do you know if you have enterprise edition or standard edition of
exchange 2000?
You can only set up a front end server if your running the enterprise =
edition of exchange. Other that that it is straight forward. try =
microsoft.com/exchange
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy
Your routing to the network which the server resides on is not correct.
Maybe not even configured... Are these remote offices a part of your AD
Forest?
D
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
You could always check for the presence of the Front End tick-box on
the server properties in ESM, or better still look for event IDs 1216
and 1217 in the event log.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative
Below is the header, will someone please explain how in the TO: field it
references a user that is different than the for field
Thank you
Received: from xxx.xxx.salesforce.com (app000.eng.salesforce.com
[ipaddress])
by news0.salesforce.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E08ACEE418
for [EMAIL
Sorry long year already. These are what I used and surprisingly it worked.
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=22837
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn
ol/exchange/plan/hostedexch/deploygd/aspd06xx.asp
ellery july
phone -
And if you want to deal with the AD issues associated with a E2k install...
thanks,
Fred Valdez
Network Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Allan Muchmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Success (or
The enterprise version supports saucer separation.
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers
How do you know if you have enterprise edition
Hey Ben, what city do you work in...there are two Peregrine buildings down
the street from me..just curious...my office is in Pleasanton CA
thanks,
Fred Valdez
Network Administrator
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24,
You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 January
The display name was different from the actual email address. I can make the
display name one thing, and the email address another.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
It is not weak to forgive, it is a gallant and brave act. - Wayne
So if it means We're limited to 16GB, we need to upgrade to enterprise
edition? Or we would need to create multiple storege groups? Is this
correct? Our physical harddrive is Raid5 60gigs.
You've got the standard version if you're limited to 16Gb.
Neil Hobson
Silversands
IIRC, Standard version only allows you one storage group... so if you want more, you
gotta upgrade
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 09:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers
You cant add more storage groups cause standard only supports one.
Sounds like you need an UG.
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers
So
Performance Optimiser - if it is Exchange 5.5
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Dejesus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 January 2002 17:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: relocate transaction log files
I need an expert advice about the implications of moving transaction log
Yes, you are limited to 16gb for the non-enterprise edition.
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Dejesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:42
Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers
So if it means We're limited
16,000 megs , not KB
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Dejesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:32
Subject: RE: front end servers and back end servers
I don't see the tick box on the servers properties about a Front
Hehe - I work in Michigan. But we do have offices in Pleasanton. Those
would be from our Remedy acquisition last year.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002
We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed
60gb on some of our servers. One of these databases has 13gb of free space
in it. We have tried to defrag this database multiple times and have failed
to complete in the time window every time.
Does anyone know what if
Thanks for the info everyone. I guess there is no way around this but to
write a check to microsoft and put it on Bill Gate's forehead.
16,000 megs , not KB
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Dejesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Judging by your 60GB DB, you need at least twice that in disk space to run
ESEUTIL. That means, to run ESEUTIL at all, you need at least 120GB and I
would say a little more to be safe for it to run.
D
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
Here is a snippet from Q272234 that tells you about offline defragmentation.
Generally, however, avoid offline defragmentation because it is an
expensive procedure. When offline defragmentation runs, it creates a new
database file and then copies all the data in the old file to the new
Sounds like ringing endoresements. Thanks for the responses. I think
it will meet the needs of this firm well.
allan
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Success (or
or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Dejesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 13:34
Subject: Re: front end servers and back end servers
Thanks for the info everyone. I
???
The To and the For are the same: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the sender has set up his address book wrong (entered the wrong name for
this address)
/\/iels
-Original Message-
From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
No they are not in AD. The remote stores are win98 with the same login for all.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
Your routing to the network
Title: RE: Recipient Name in an email different than SMTP Address
Most spammers have a program which reads a list of email addresses. When connecting to an SMTP server the program can specify a Display Name and an email address. For example, if you are using Outlook Express you can specify an
This may be a very stupid question, but how do you get a list of NT users
logged in to the domain at any point in time?
Thank you!
Courtney Piratzky
IT-Technical Services
Sr. Systems Programmer
Georgia System Operations Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-270-7212
List Charter and FAQ at:
I have one more question. What is the installation process of upgrading
from exchange 2000 standard to exchange 2000 enterprise edition?
or Cat5 to your user's hand to delete some emails ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jimmy Dejesus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer then click sessions
-Original Message-
From: Piratzky, Courtney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Who's logged on NT domain
This may be a very stupid
Title: RE: OWA usage
Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me.
From Dell:
You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has
a machine that they are pulling data down to their Outlook directly
off of the server then they would need a CAL.
-Original Message-
Title: RE: OWA usage
I
believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many software vendors
who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA users do
need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get away with buying no CAL's by
just having everyone use the web interface.
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
in 2k right click my computer connect to another computer
then click sessions
Hmmm. In my Win2K Pro, I have no option Connect to another computer, when I right click on My Computer, from the desktop.
List Charter and FAQ at:
Okay, now I have created a form, and need some help. I have three different
categories represented by three radio buttons. They are Servers, Switches,
and Routers, now each Radio button is accompanied by a drop down list with
all the different names for each selection. Now I need help in the
We have another drive we have added for the defrag and we need to defrag the
database because there is only 300mb of free space on the database drive and
to expand the disk, we need to move the database of the disk and expand them
move it back.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin
Hello All,
Win2ksrv sp2, Ex55sp4
Yesterday I completed an Ed Crowley Server move to a new box...everything
seems to be ok, however, sometimes the IS and IMS will terminate
unexpectedly with error ID 7031, I have to reboot the server to get it
running again, this has happenned twice in the
I don't have a connect from my computer properties. Is this applicable only
in a W2K domain?
Courtney Piratzky
IT-Technical Services
Sr. Systems Programmer
Georgia System Operations Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
770-270-7212
-Original Message-
From: Brien Mayer [mailto:[EMAIL
You still didn't mention whether the drive you added has at least 60gb of
free space. Assuming it does, what is stopping you from simply running the
Performance optimizer to move the databases off the current drive, then
expand the drive, then move them back by running Optimizer again? You do
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Thats.. right-click My Computer-Manage-Action-Connect to
another computer
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24,
2002 11:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Who's logged on
Title: RE: OWA usage
According to Microsoft. If you authenticate you need a CAL. So you more
than likely you are having your users authenticate. If not then I hope their
mail isn't important to them
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence
Office Exchange and Bar Code
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
or My
computer Manage right click Computer Management Connect to another
computer. Either way gets you to the same place
-Original Message-From: Jim Busick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002
2:53 PMTo: MS-Exchange
Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0 SP6a
I have a user who sent a meeting request to four people this morning.
She received a message back from the System Administrator account
this afternoon saying two of the recipeints could not be contacted.
However, the two recipients listed were NOT
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
I'm
sorry, but now I can't find sessions.
Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems
Programmer Georgia System Operations
Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212
-Original Message-From: Brien Mayer
[mailto:[EMAIL
Anyone using the new Trend SMTP Interscan Viruswall?
Got a problem hope anyone can help with...
Im having this problem with the new version 5.01. It has this HOP count
setting that it trys to check before sending any internet bound email how
many HOPs it will take to deliver the message.
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
AH. I
was wondering where the "Connect" was; I wasn't seeing it before. Got it now.
Thanks.
--
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia,
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Please just look around! What does it
take, 5 seconds to look through the fields you have available? You will find
it under Shares, Sessions. I really don't think that this will give you
the information that you are looking for, but that is how you get
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
shared
files
-Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24,
2002 3:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Who's logged on NT domain
I'm
sorry, but now I can't find sessions.
Title: Message
I agree with Ben, the original question was "how do you get a list of NT users logged in to the domain at any
point in time?" This only shows you who is
connected to whatever computer share you are connected to at the
time.
-Original Message-From: Benjamin
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
I
found sessions under shared folders...
Is
there a command line method? Can you only look at each
server?
Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems
Programmer Georgia System Operations
Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
expand
shared files. You can e-mail direct give me your # I will walk you
through it
Brien
-Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24,
2002 3:01 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
So what do I need to do? No they are not part of AD
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: exchange 1 domain 2 subnets
Your routing to the network which the server resides on is
I have seen past AA, who had delegate access to the mailbox. Whenever the
manager was copied, the AA was copied, since the mailbox didn't exist, it
would bounce back. As soon as I removed this name, the problem was gone.
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
OK
this is getting out of hand. click action click connect to another computer
comect to the server you want then click session
-Original Message-From: Piratzky, Courtney
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24,
2002 3:10
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
Geez...there is a delay. I sent my message well before
your replies came through.
Courtney Piratzky IT-Technical Services Sr. Systems
Programmer Georgia System Operations
Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-270-7212
-Original Message-From:
AFAIK, it should be roughly the same as it is for 5.5. Insert CD, run
setup. Setup will detect that you already have Exchange installed, and will
simply re-copy the files, which will then make it Enterprise.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original
Right. Try something like usrstat.exe from the RK.
-- Original Message --
From: Dahl, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:11:52 -0600
I agree with Ben, the original question was how do
I currently have a problem with outgoing mail. Nothing is going through.
I have incoming mail being sent to the users. but their out going mail is
being queued at the internet mail service. It states that the message
will continue to be retried until the configured maximum timeout period.
Title: RE: Who's logged on NT domain
No
this is not out of hand. I found the GUI result and saw that it did not have
what I was looking for. My new question was for a command line method. And is
this per server only, or can you do the entire NT domain? I do not want
the GUI because it does
You are really better off running OWA on a different box than Exchange.
That's really what it was designed for. Second, if you uninstall the SMTP
Service from IIS, it will NOT shut down the Exchange services. They are
completely separate. But you do need to actually uninstall it, not just
shut
Please explain, time window?
-Original Message-
From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
We have an on going problem in our company, our Exchange database exceed
60gb on
When you open up the message in the IMS que. What is the error?
-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: outgoing mail
I currently have a problem with outgoing mail. Nothing is going
How long is your time window?
Dependent on the I/O capabilities of your system, it could take a few
days to compress a 60GB store. You can roughly judge the speed by
looking at the size of the temp DB during the process. It will slowly
grow to about 47GB before it completes.
60GB isn't
How long management will allow the server to be unavailable before they
freak out.
-Original Message-
From: Kopec, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ESEUTIL DEFRAGS LIMITATIONs
Please explain, time
Point taken. What I'm trying to do is experimental. I don't have the funds
for another machine to toy with at the present. So this is what I have:
Machine on net with IP.
DNS on machine that is authoritative.
mx pointer pointing to machine name.
Exchange 5.5 installed
W2K sp2 installed
Ex5.5 sp
I had a similar issue recently after dealing with an open relay. Even after
closing up the relay, my outbound queue would not deliver mail until the
queue was brought down to a reasonable number of messages (I believe it
started delivering mail again when the number came down to a few
What is technet for OUTBOX I have a user with same problem
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Meeting Request Confusion
Exchange 5.5 SP4 using Outlook 98. NT 4.0
Personally, I would make them part of your AD structure and perform all
authentication that way. However, without knowing all the specifics about
your environment, my theory is more speculation than anything.
Personally IMNSHO, if you're not sure of what you need to do, it sounds to
me like you
TechNet is a Microsoft support site, it is very useful.
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/
-Original Message-
From: mollahassani, parviz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Meeting Request Confusion
What is
The error message I get when I open the message in the IMS queue is
network error during host resolution
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
How can I change the storage space limit warning message on Exchange 2000?
Thanks in advance,
David
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
No can doUnless you have a really nice budget for it.
-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: how do I change storage space warrning message?
How can I change the storage space
Probably a DNS issue.
Find one of the offending domains. FROM THE EXCHANGE SERVER, do an Nslookup.
See if you can.
-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: outgoing mail
The error message
There had to be a way..
David
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 4:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: how do I change storage space warrning message?
No can doUnless you have a really nice budget for
If you say so...
-Original Message-
From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: how do I change storage space warrning message?
There had to be a way..
David
-Original Message-
From: Martin
In Exch Admin,
Give the delegate Send As rights to the mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:48 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: can't send message on behalf
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4..
Good afternoon,
Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4..
I have a delegate that is trying to REPLY to a message from the mailbox.
When they try and send the message they get 'you do not have permission of
the individual to send this email' message.
I looked at Google and it says to give the
I'm not too sure of how to use the nslookup. There is a problem with me
accessing webpages, and I am not able to ping yahoo.com from the Exchange
server. I am however able to do all of the above on other machines.
List Charter and FAQ at:
Is it possible that the 2 people that received the message and shouldn't
have been were setup as delegates of one or more of the people that were
invited? This would explain why they received the invites.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
Yahoo doesn't accept ICMP packets.
Start, Run, Cmd, OK.
NSLookup
Set type=MX
Superioraccess.net
Tell me what you get back.
-Original Message-
From: aci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: outgoing mail
I'm not
On microsoft technet security white paper, they recommend setting up the
Outlook client to use encrypted RPC. I am wondering if anyone has any
recommendations on setting up a secure Outlook profile (Outlook 2000).
Thanks for any input
List Charter and FAQ at:
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
