I dunno
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 4:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution List Limit
So the same is true for 2000 ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
So the same is true for 2000 ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 14:59
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Distribution List Limit
Yes. That is true. I can never remember the exact number, but there is
the limi
Yes. That is true. I can never remember the exact number, but there is the
limit.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Distribution List Limit
"Exchange Server 5.5 has a limi
To be sure, to block a user from sending email to ANYONE in my company - use
the Reject delivery from option within the IMC Delivery Restrictions? Do I
really have to create a custom recipient in order to add this A$$ to my
block list?
BTW:
Exchange 5.5 SP4+
NT 4
Blue pants and socks
And yes
"Exchange Server 5.5 has a limit of 160 contacts in a distribution list.
You can side-step the limit by splitting your lists."
Is this true ? I never made a list above 100 in 5.5 .. Is this also the
case in Exchange 2000 ?
_
Do You Yaho
ETRN, I use it at home for years now...
The bomb. I love Outlook exchange client mode at home.
jlc
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Server in a Cable Enviro
What about :
http://www.inet7.com/exchange2000.asp?source=overture.exho
http://www.intermedia.net/exchange/overview.asp
?
-Original Message-
From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:07
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Server in a
I guess you could use something like DNS2Go, but overall, this is a poor
idea.
You would be better off with something like DSL.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 9:21 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange S
The receive part will be difficult. Send doesn't matter with static or
dynamic - only on your DNS. For the receive part, if your ISP (Comcast will
charge you out the A$$) will not let you buy an IP address, you could resort
to using ETRN (refer to the Exchange FAQ for how to) providing your ISP wi
I want to setup a Home Office and I have a Cable Modem which they tell me
cannot guarantee a static IP address. Our mail records are hosted by an
ISP. Is there a way for me to setup an Exchange 5.5 or 2000 server to
receive and send mail in this configuration? Where and what do I have to
config
Title: Message
I have
heard no mention of the SP level of this Exchange server.
-Original Message-From: Bert Macias
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002
2:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: OWA
again
I had one user that solved this pro
Title: Message
I had one user that solved this problem with an
upgrade of IE...he had been using v 4.x or something to that
effect...
- Original Message -
From:
Matthew
Carpenter
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Issues
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:19
PM
Subject: OW
12 matches
Mail list logo