Re: It's Friday!!

2002-05-05 Thread Bart Southworth
And some do both And commute 3 hrs on Monday mornings :( - Original Message - From: "Wayne Hanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 10:18 PM Subject: RE: It's Friday!! > I was just saying that I finally realise why so man

RE: It's Friday!!

2002-05-05 Thread Wayne Hanks
I was just saying that I finally realise why so many parents arrive at the office on a Monday looking like they just spent the weekend at a rave party for 48 hours whilst trying to juggle eggs. :) Some parents do it with style, others just lose it. -Original Message- From: Bart Southwo

Re: It's Friday!!

2002-05-05 Thread Bart Southworth
40. 7, 5, 2.5 Get over it. ;-) - Original Message - From: "Wayne Hanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:50 PM Subject: RE: It's Friday!! > 38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months (try surviving for 3 years with very limited

RE: It's Friday!!

2002-05-05 Thread Wayne Hanks
38 with 2 boys, 3 and 8months (try surviving for 3 years with very limited sleep, It makes you realise why people can go postal over the dummest things:-) ) -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 5:32 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues S

RE: Removing Unknown SMTP/ESMTP Message Headers/Keywords

2002-05-05 Thread Wayne Hanks
Title: Message I know Don, I have one of those POS Watchguards as well and would dearly love to put a PIX in place but with the exchange rate and the downturn in the Broking business it is very difficult to convince managment that laying out $30 G for a firewall is a Very Good Idea.  You Kno

RE: It's Friday!!

2002-05-05 Thread Wayne Hanks
Title: RE: It's Friday!! Thanks Sherry, I am currently reading this in my office on Monday morning while trying to dry out after getting soaked on the way to the bus stop.  Do you know that you really feel much warmer when you are laughing? :) -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, S

RE: INbound IMC mail conversion processing SLOW

2002-05-05 Thread Rose, Adrian
Originally we resolved inbound names via DNS before delivery, we switched this off for a couple of days to see if it made any difference, Unfortunately it didn't. -Original Message- From: Reto Inversini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 6 May 2002 9:44 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue

Re: INbound IMC mail conversion processing SLOW

2002-05-05 Thread Reto Inversini
> Messages/hr, Queued MTS-IN etc...) > All seems fine until we start to receive 2800 - 3200 messages/hour and then > all goes painfully slow. The measure of Inbound bytes doesn't seem to matter > to much. > just guessing ... could the problem be elsewhere ... e.g. do you do DNS-lookups for every m

RE: INbound IMC mail conversion processing SLOW

2002-05-05 Thread Rose, Adrian
The event logs register nothing of any interest. Everything appears to be running fine except... We are running a few performance counters (Inbound bytes/hr, Inbound Messages/hr, Queued MTS-IN etc...) All seems fine until we start to receive 2800 - 3200 messages/hour and then all goes painfully s