If its VMWare typically "C" and "D" are on the same VMWare Datastore ==
the same physical disk so it doesn't matter (so much) where you put the
page file.
You may need to remind you VMWare/SAN guys and girls that when Microsoft
says separate physical devices, in virtual or in a SAN environment t
What are the server roles installed on each server and are they also domain
controllers?
Can the user(s) log in to OWA whilst they are unable to connect via Outlook?
Richard
From: bounce-9361649-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9361649-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Be
Both servers are Mailbox servers, Client Access Servers and hub transport
servers.
Neither of them are domain controllers
OWA works fine and users are currently using this whilst we work out what is
happening.
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 24 June 2011 11:12
To: M
Ok, I'm not sure exactly how CAS arrays work with respect to Web Access, but if
you don't have a CAS array, and you turn off the CAS server listed under
RpcClientAccessServer (per-database setting), Outlook won't be able to connect
to that database. If you created a CAS array after you create a
Thanks for your help, the RpcClientAccessServer is showing up as the dr server.
So I can set this back to the normal server.
I did not knowingly create a CAS array so I don't think I have one!
What I was aiming for was a mirrored copy of one of the mailbox databases in
the remote site on a serv
yes
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 12:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Change from authoritative to internal
Can be safely changed from EMC without deleting it firs
RpcClientAccessServer is static once it's been set - with more than one CAS,
I'd certainly recommend finding the instructions to set one up, and pointing
your mailbox databases at it!
Get-ClientAccessArray - anything there? If not, you don't have one :)
I think your configuration should be fine
You are doing just fine and my advice is the same as yours.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook clients n
Thank you ,
Is the second part of KB 2418914 (creating a connector for sending ) valid also
for Exchange 2010?
TIA
Guido Elia
HELPPC
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Inviato: venerdì 24 giugno 2011 14.23
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE
Everything ok now after reset and as expected I don't has a CAS array!
Any clues as to why it would be set to the dr server? I'm guessing that it
occurred sometime around when I was creating the DAG.
Thanks again
Andy
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 24 June 2011 13
Also yes.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: HELP_PC [mailto:g...@enter.it]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: R: Change from authoritative to internal
Thank you ,
Is the second part of KB 2418914 (
When the database is created it will choose a random CAS server for its
RpcClientAccessServer, or if a CAS Array is present it will always use that.
Good stuff :)
Richard
From: bounce-9361813-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9361813-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behal
Thanks AGAIN
Guido Elia
HELPPC
Da: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Inviato: venerdì 24 giugno 2011 16.01
A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Change from authoritative to internal
Also yes.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MV
Just to make this more weird, now I'm not getting a defer, I'm getting a 550
5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound. This is only when I'm trying to send a
message from the outside to a public folder that is only in Exchange 2003 using
one of my 2010 CAS Arrays. If I send the same message to a differe
Does anyone have a suggestion for limiting the scope of the query in AD for the
caller ID on missed calls and voice messages. We keep all of our departed user
accounts in an AD OU above the active users OU structure. The EUM lookup is
matching the numbers found on the departed users before it
Yup...gonna be a bumpy ride...
Larry
From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Address Book Question
Companies that do a lot of buying of other companies have teams, and processes
dedicated to this. I've seen a number
I have a 2003/2010 mixed environment. I have moved a bunch of mailboxes
successfully between the two (both ways). I still have a bunch to move from
2003->2010. What I need to do is optimize the disk writes/reads for the data as
it moves. When I move too many mailboxes at time the system keeps g
17 matches
Mail list logo