yes , they ware backward compatable
Jean-Paul Natola
Subject: CALs for Exchange 2003 server?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:26:04 -0400
From: david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com
To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
CALs for Exchange 2003 server?
Hi a
Correct. Getting CAL's for Exchange 2010 will be fine/backward compatible
for your 2003 server.
Chris
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:26 PM, David Mazzaccaro <
david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com> wrote:
> **
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m trying to figure out which CALs I should be purchasing for my
> Exchange
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out which CALs I should be purchasing for my
Exchange 2003 server.
In the past, I was buying "381-03096" which is "Exchange 2007 Standard
Device CAL".
These appear to be no longer available, and I'm not sure what the
replacement would be.
I assume some flavor of Exchang
I believe that's the issue there... shows coming from 199.255.164.130 and
should be coming from 199.255.164.139 (mail.aurico.com). We have a PTR setup
for mail.aurico.com to 199.255.164.139.
Regards,
Cameron
_
Cameron Cooper | IT Manager | Aurico
Di
Received: from mail.aurico.com ([199.255.164.130]) by 10.129.24.70 with SMTP
(Lyris ListManager WIN32 version 11.1a); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:11:36 -0400
According to the abovethe listserver got it from 199.255.164.130. And
there is no PTR for that IP address.
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kenned
Three possibilities that I see.
One:
Your sending server is HELO'ing with webmail.aurico.com. Some places want to
see your HELO match the rDNS for the IP in the connection. AOL for example. I
call it fully circular DNS. You should HELO/EHLO mail.aurico.com from
199.225.164.10 and that IP sh
All,
Since last week, we've had several issues with email delivery and NDRs. The
first issue started with the following NDR received when trying to email a
client:
- Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [199.255.164.130].
The main part of the issue was that mail.aurico.c
Can you clarlify the statement " Just consider them separately from logs and
databases"
They are currently using a hosted imap/pop3 provider I provide the offsite
backup and the device, insiginificant amount of the clients storgage is
affected. So OS/PageFile on mirror and logs / db on R10?
Well I played with my Backup Window so it would not overlap maintenance
schedule and waited a few more days and it is working now.
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Yes, that could certainly play a part.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@g
I would not put the logs on the same array as the OS/pagefile. Just consider
them separately from logs and databases.
If you haven't already, make sure you using the Microsoft Exchange Mailbox
Server Role Requirements Calculator to check what you need:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive
No it might be outlook.contoso.com and outlook-dr.contoso.com but in the event
of a disaster you update outlook.contoso.com to the same IP as
outlook-dr.contoso.com. But normally it only resolves to it's normal site.
From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 18 June 2012 12:
I wonder if in a backhanded sort of way-if SP2 RU3 would do something
Current - Clients connect to DB in primary site.
Change - you said you need to switch primary and secondary sites around. If
you're making the DB active in what is now the secondary site...
[3] After applying Exchange 2010 RU3
Owe I see, Like I am doing with the owa.domain.com, I have the URLs set the
same and rely on DNS. So what you are saying is both cas arrays from both sites
can have the same name?
From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk]
Sent: 18 June 2012 11:55
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject
Richard is pretty much right on both counts.
However you ask the question at an opportune time as Exchange 2010 SP2 UR3 has
been released, which includes the fix (or new feature) which is useful in this
situation. The following article by Ross Smith IV talks more about this
including the before
No, once the mail profile has the name of a CAS array, it won't get updated if
you change the RPCClientAccessServer property on the database.
What I think most people do is have a short TTL on the DNS for their CAS Array
name, then change the IP Address to point to a CAS array in the secondary s
* I also tried the Set-MailboxDatabase -RPCClientAccessServer
but it didn't auto configure the clients for
that database, I thought it might of.
From: Paul Cookman [mailto:paul.cook...@selection.co.uk]
Sent: 18 June 2012 11:38
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Dag Question rega
Hi,
The databases are all on one mailbox server in an active passive setup and in
my primary site they point to a cass array. In the passive site I can create an
array like your article suggests but I am thinking the users will still need to
reconfigure their outlook profiles to the other site'
>If I have a Cass Server called primary and another Cass called Secondary in a
>secondary
>location and I have 100 users in a third site with Outlook profiles pointing
>to primary and
>want to point them to secondary, how would I go about it?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332317.a
18 matches
Mail list logo
