Office 13 looks really good to me too. I'm impressed that it's not to
dramatically different from 2010 in terms of the ribbon etc. The learning curve
doesn't look too great between the two.
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 July 2012 00:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I really hate the CAPITAL LETTERS ON ALL THE MENU ITEMS.
From: bounce-9533711-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9533711-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Goodman
Sent: 17 July 2012 11:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: e15 beta
Office 13 looks
Cosmetic things like that will probably change once the code goes gold. One
of the things that is a bit annoying is the cursor is a bit delayed from my
fingers on the keyboard. Word 2010 was a bit more 'snappy' in that regard,
it didn't 'paint' the letters on the screen.
John M.
From:
That's the Metro style. I don't expect it to change, even though I hate it
too.
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: e15 beta
Cosmetic things like that will probably change once the code goes gold.
Hooray, no more client RPC!
Sweet, simplified server roles (just 2)!
Umm...Outlook is no longer the Gold App?
Ugh...What's the secret way to get Outlook15 talking to Exchange 2k3?
Enough with the great, the good, the bad, and the ugly ;) If it's gonna be
POP/IMAP only for the ugly case, which
Well if it worked, it definitely would have been simple.
So in this case I would be looking at putting on a fresh install and using the
procedure described in Database Portability?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876926
-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith
We're doing restores from tape. Initially when we brought this in we were told
that if we had DAGs that tape backups were unnecessary. This was explained as
if we had a 3 member DAG with at least one member off-site then the only thing
we had to worry about would be database corruption, and
I don't think that Outlook 15 can talk to Exchange 2003. I think it's blocked
internally, at least that was the discussion at one point. But it would have to
be using RPC/HTTP with encryption turned OFF, if it were to work at all.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz
Ayup.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Recover 2010 DAG CAS?HUB/Mailbox member to a single
CAS/HUB/Mailbox server?
Well if it worked, it definitely would have been
We participate in a partner company's domain due to some common accounting
software requirements. We operate a backend E2003 box for our users and
they have all the front end roles on their E2003 servers. They're just
preparing to move from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. I'm thinking that
Read through the online help files for Data Center Activation Mode. If one of
your DAG members is off-site, and not lagged, that might be an easier way of
doing a restore. You should also read the section about having services coming
up without wan connections to the DR site. If the DR site is
See... I can't tell you why. But I don't recommend you wait.
Let me share a story though - Exchange 2010 wasn't feature complete until SP1.
Exchange 2007 wasn't feature complete until SP1. Build expectations from
history.
You also can't migrate directly from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2013.
Thanks for the clarification.
Roger Wright
___
Geocaching: Hide, Hunt, Find Repeat - It's FUN!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com
Date: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: e15 beta
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
I've installed Exchange on the server and the EMC brings up the names of my
original databases (on the DAGs, which of course are all failed). I can't
remove them using EMC or Powershell because Exchange thinks they're still out
there somewhere. I had to remove the server using adsiedit, so
We are currently migrating our mailboxes from Domain 1 to Domain 2 (not the
same forests, completely separate with a two way trust). Both domains use
Exchange 2007. In Domain 1, Suzy was a delegate on Bobs Calendar items. Suzy
moved from Domain 1 to Domain 2 yesterday. We were trying to
ayup
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:robert.mccre...@dplinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 1:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA Across Domains.
We are currently migrating our mailboxes from Domain 1 to Domain 2 (not the
same forests, completely separate with a two way trust).
Change of plan. What if I create a new CAS/HUB/Mailbox server with a new
mailbox and recovery database, and do a Dial Tone Recovery? That should work,
shouldn't it?
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 12:30 PM
To:
Michael - have you updated the blog on upgrading to SP2?
(http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2011/12/07/installing-exchange-2010-service-pack-2.aspx)
Is it still accurate to get to RU3?
Do I just go through the SP2 process - reboot and then apply RU3?
Are there any issues
Also - are there coexistence issues within a DAG on SP2RU3 and SP1RU5
combination?
From: Stringham, Steven [mailto:sstri...@lrlaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ex2010 - SP1RU5 - SP2RU3
Michael - have you updated
No.
Stand up a new server on an isolated network having the same name as the
exchange server.
Install AD with a matching domain name.
Install Exchange with a matching organization name.
Create a matching mailbox database name (or a recovery mailbox DB - doesn't
matter).
Create the user in
20 matches
Mail list logo
