I know the answer is "yes", but I've never done it. Let me see if the
documentation is publicly available. It may take me a day or two, I'm on the
road travelling home after a couple weeks in a certain pacific northwest city.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.
To clarify, passive federated signin to OWA works by the client
starting with a request https://mail.foo.bar/owa/ and following a
redirect over to the ADFS2 STS, which handles authenticating the
client (via one of Kerberos or forms-based auth), the result of which
renders a new HTML form for the cl
Regular outlook client would use RPC/HTTP. ActiveSync is a http-based
technology, so I'm not sure what you are asking about there...
Is it supported "in general"? I dunno. But that's how Office 365 federation
works.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sen
Hi list,
Having just configured Exchange 2010 SP2 with ADFS2 in a lab
environment (somewhat but not entirely based on Ken St. Cyr's guide @
http://www.theidentityguy.com/articles/2010/10/15/access-owa-with-adfs.html
which, although very helpful, also documents some things that didn't
or at least d
I was more interested in hearing what my fellow Exchange admins have done
in their organizations or clients. I'll re-read their documentation, but
was hoping for others to share their experiences. Thanks.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Opportunistic encryption isn’t
Not as such.
However, UAG only works with Win7 Enterprise or Ultimate, so most
folks have paid a price one way or the other for the client OS.
Kurt
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Adm wrote:
> Does UAG require CALs?
> I don't believe TMG does.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Michael B.
True, but installing UAG will install TMG - it's a hard dependency, AFAICT.
Kurt
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Be aware that, as of “today” the feature set between TMG and UAG is not
> identical. You need determine your support requirements BEFORE you spend
> your mo
Does UAG require CALs?
I don't believe TMG does.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> Be aware that, as of “today” the feature set between TMG and UAG is not
> identical. You need determine your support requirements BEFORE you spend
> your money.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* G
Be aware that, as of "today" the feature set between TMG and UAG is not
identical. You need determine your support requirements BEFORE you spend your
money.
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 6:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly
Thanks all.
From: bounce-9536604-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
[mailto:bounce-9536604-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Graeme
Carstairs
Sent: 27 July 2012 11:37
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Slightly off topic.. ISA Server is now..?
If your looking to play I wou
If your looking to play I would look at forefront UAG as well, as I have
heard rumours that they are going to become a single solution, then I would
imagine it would include the UAG feature set.
Graeme
On 27 July 2012 11:34, Steve Goodman wrote:
> Yes it's Forefront TMG and it's basically the
11 matches
Mail list logo
