I have a feeling that the soundtrack isn't the original for that video.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A solved problem with Exchange 2003 - weird little issue...
Prepare
If it’s the one I think it is (and corporate policy blocks ALL Youtube so I
can't look at present) it’s a Weird Al skit.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2013 11:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A solved problem with
Possibly true...
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:31 AM, John Matteson john.matte...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a feeling that the soundtrack isn't the original for that video.
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:26 AM
To:
Definitely.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKLWfhhLZAs
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A solved problem with Exchange 2003 - weird little issue...
Possibly true...
On Wed,
Edge in the DMZ.
Everything else inside.
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 migration
My question is for the new 2010 design. My architect wants to put the 2 CAS
servers in the DMZ and 2 MBX/HT in
It is NOT SUPPORTED to put CAS in the DMZ.
If you do not want to expose Exchange directly to the internet, then use a
firewall with DPI or a reverse proxy.
I don't know who your architect is, but I recommend you get someone who
understands Exchange 2010. :)
From: Jimmy Tran
Regarding the architect, what exactly is this person's actual title and role?
I can't believe the architect would suggest a thing.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:56 AM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote:
It is NOT SUPPORTED to put CAS in the DMZ.
If you do not want
Change your architect obvious he does not know what he/ she is doing ,
sorry for coming staight like this but this is pretty exchange 101 , no
Exchange server to be placed in DMZ ( edge is exception
Classis configuration would be all inside
2 cas hts combined
2 mbx in a DAG
Now there it
I think its time to twist the question. So perhaps we can say :-
“If you put your server CAS in a DMZ it will no longer be a DMZ…”
Dave Wade
0161 474 5456
From: Oz Casey Dedeal [mailto:telne...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2013 15:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: 2010 migration
Change
Well the architect isn’t really an architect, just a system admin who is adamit
about his design. The problem is, he doesn’t know anything about exchange 2010…
Anyways, will a NAT rule from the firewall to the CAS work instead of an edge
server?
From: Oz Casey Dedeal
Just say no, and send your adamant admin the following:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=exchange+2010+cas+in+dmz. (Make sure he clicks on the
VERY FIRST LINK.)
Good luck.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote:
Well the architect isn’t really an architect, just a
I think I misread your question. Are you saying firewall rules which
direct appropriate traffic from the Internet directly to your CAS servers
in the trusted zone instead of having your CAS servers in the DMZ?
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Richard Stovall rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Just say
No you read it right. I suggested appropriate nat rules from firewall to Cas
array and he wants to put cas in dmz.
With his design my servers don't like it. With mine everything is happy
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Richard
yes
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Jimmy Tran ji...@jt-solution.com wrote:
Well the architect isn’t really an architect, just a system admin who is
adamit about his design. The problem is, he doesn’t know anything about
exchange 2010…
** **
Anyways, will a NAT rule from the
You might want to revoke the person’s System Admin license and put him to work
running clean-ups on a WSUS server.
From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 migration
Well the architect isn’t
Nope. Muppets on the Disney channel.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A solved problem with Exchange 2003 - weird little issue...
If it’s the one I think it is (and
Lol that’s a good one.
From: John Matteson [mailto:john.matte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 migration
You might want to revoke the person’s System Admin license and put him to work
running clean-ups on a WSUS server.
From:
Or cleaning up the server room floor...
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:46 PM, John Matteson john.matte...@gmail.comwrote:
You might want to revoke the person’s System Admin license and put him to
work running clean-ups on a WSUS server.
** **
*From:* Jimmy Tran
Supposed to be the worst cyberattack ever
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/03/27/spam-blocking-group-spamhaus-reports-being-hit-by-massive-cyberattack-many/
...Tim
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
I'm based in the UK and my internet speed is no worse than normal. That DNS
reflector attack is quite neat though, I have to admit.
On 27 March 2013 21:54, Tim Evans tev...@sparling.com wrote:
Supposed to be the worst cyberattack ever
Here is another article with a bit more technical details:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/03/spamhaus-ddos-grows-to-internet-threatening-size/
Yes, the DNS reflector attack is interesting, as is CloudFlare's anycast
defense against it. I haven't seen any difference in my connections out
21 matches
Mail list logo
