Personally, I'm a fan of patches... No OS is perfect and improvements are
necessary. Where's Apple's published, scheduled patch day?
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Adm wrote:
> Could be worse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_Tuesday
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013
It's an Apple device, that makes it worse
This on the other hand... Makes me LOL!!
http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-apple-hit-hackers-targeted-facebook-last-week-181509845--sector.html
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> It can always be worse...
>
> Heh.
>
> On Tue, Fe
e 5
> phones.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:35 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ios6.1 woes
>
> ** **
>
> The fix is only for
The fix is only for the 4s. No other phone is getting it currently
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Dan Hyatt wrote:
> I actually installed it on my Verizon iphone 4S.
>
> So far so good.
>
> > From: mich...@smithcons.com
>
> > To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
> > Subject: RE:
> But yes.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Heaton, Joseph@DFG [mailto:jhea...@dfg.ca.gov ]
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 19, 2012 6:43 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Trying to setup a redirect rule
>
> ** **
>
> This would be for multiple people, 200+. Cou
What about a transport rule?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote:
> I’m trying to setup a redirect rule for all mail to be redirected to a
> sister organization. From inside the test mailbox, I can send a message
> directly, and it works. But the redirect just doesn’t se
Mail, calendar, and contacts are all you will get by default using the
native EAS client... Touchdown will give you Notes and Tasks...
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG wrote:
> Testing a Verizon LG Spectrum at the moment, only able to sync mail and
> contacts. Gingerbread
Wrong link... Try this...
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/all_forums/?forum=&sb=1
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> http://supportforums.sunbeltsoftware.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Phil Hershey wrote:
>
>> Been a member for
http://supportforums.sunbeltsoftware.com/
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Phil Hershey wrote:
> Been a member for years, and this list has been a big help. Where can I
> send someone to sign up for exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com?
> I’ve been trying to track it down at sunbeltsoftware
Yes
On Nov 16, 2011 9:47 AM, "Oriel Ruiz-Ropero" wrote:
> Hello Guys, thanks in advance.
> I would like to know if MS Exchange 2010 SP1 is compatible with CISCO Call
> Manager V 7.1.5 or 7.15. I have been looking all over but have not been
> able to find any facts about this.
> Regards
> O.Ruiz
>
What are the symptoms?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:59 AM, David Mazzaccaro <
david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com> wrote:
> Yup - I just got my ticket # and hung up… not good. Not good at all.
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Mon
I'm sensing a trend here...
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Don Andrews wrote:
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
>
> ** **
>
> *From:
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:32 PM, MMF wrote:
> I went to the home page of Sunbelt to unsubscrib
I missed that, could you repeat it ONE more time? lol!
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> I repeat: it is NOT supported.
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> ** **
>
> Michael B. Smith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
> ** *
> Jon
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> > Works fine for me!
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jon D wrote:
> >>
> >> Has anyone else noticed Touchdown for Android phones doesn't do an
> >> exchange acti
Works fine for me!
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jon D wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed Touchdown for Android phones doesn't do an
> exchange activesync remote wipe if the phone isn't in 'push' mode?
>
> I've tried manually syncing the phones after the wipe command, waiting
> 24+ hours, reboo
Shared SMTP address space... GW will have to know where the owner of the
SMTP domain is via some routing connector...
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Joseph Heaton wrote:
> I know, not a Groupwise forum. But there's a bunch of really smart people
> here, so I have my fingers crossed.
>
> I ha
com> wrote:
> Has MS really closed the gap between EAS and BES enough to make that a
> wholesale, practical recommendation(as far as security is concerned)?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Don Ely wrote:
>
>> I'll speak! Drop kick your BES server into the Sea of J
I'll speak! Drop kick your BES server into the Sea of Japan and use EAS
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> It would be safe to presume (not ASSUME) J based on the way I worded my
> answer that there are known issues until 2010 sp1 ur3.
>
>
>
> Now, because of how I k
Why don't you want to open it? If you're concerned about crap embedded,
convert in to plain text. The open the message, go to File and select
properties...
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote:
> Sorry, just had to say this...
>
>
> Aside from the fact that they changed (lengthened
while and haven't gotten to the bundled fix
> yet. Will ask about that tomorrow. Thanks. We've already done the MAPI
> update and sent them logs etc.
>
> *Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless*
>
>
> -Original message-
>
> *From: *Don Ely *
> To: *MS-Ex
There isn't a published ETA on MR5 yet. The bundled fix injects some
message attributes into each user account that the BES specifically looks
for. This results in the BAS not having to scan every attribute of every
message in a message store which is part of the reason for the delays
resulting i
Disconnect their current AD account from the mailbox and connect to the new
one after the trust relationship is in place.
On Mar 4, 2011 1:43 PM, "Level 5 - Lists" wrote:
> I have a site that purchased another company that was using lotus, so we
> pushed them onto Exchange and just using rpc/https
47-890-4021 | Fax: 847-255-1896
>
> ccoo...@aurico.com | www.aurico.com
>
>
>
> From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 11:56 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Alias Email Address
>
>
>
> Message tracking
Message tracking if you're relaying off of your Exchange server...
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Cameron Cooper wrote:
> What we’re looking for is the email that would be sent from SQL to a
> client (ie like this email, I would be able to look into my ‘Sent Items’ and
> see the actual email t
Hey folks,
I'm trying to implement the quarantine feature on Exchange 2010 RU4 in our
environment. I ran the following PowerShell command and it works
flawlessly except for one thing... Only one device ID per user is
allowed. If I try to activate another deivce for a user, it disables the
fir
Check her legacy excahnge dn
On Feb 24, 2011 2:20 PM, "John C Owen" wrote:
> Sorry, but no
>
> Same error
>
> From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:37 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Meeting Request Error
>
> Does it work from OWA?
nd over the whole conversation with appropriate edits
> to make it suitable for public consumption.
>
>
>
> \\Steve//
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:41 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subje
IIS Logs for starters...
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Szabo wrote:
> SBS 2003
> Exchange 2003
>
> Recently moved a small office to the Exchange server from their Verizon
> e-mail service. Server is up to date with patches as is Exchange (Exchange,
> near as I can tell). There are 5 user
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Szabo wrote:
> SBS 2003
> Exchange 2003
>
> Recently moved a small office to the Exchange server from their Verizon
> e-mail service. Server is up to date with patches as is Exchange (Exchange,
> near as I can tell). There are 5 users and all but one have no
ifference, the randomness (and frustration) continuesJ
>
>
>
> ~230 EAS, ~1450 BB’s
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:38 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ActiveSync Question
>
>
>
>
th
> were happy.
> Very compatitively priced to BES. I also like the silo or firewall
> approach, where all the company/enterprise information exists within the app
> and doesn't integrate into the personal apps/info of the user.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:34 P
S call but really don’t
> want to get run-around bs
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:27 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: ActiveSync Question
>
>
>
> LOL! You have no idea! Been o
You call it a fall back solution, I call it a mass exodus from RIM...
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> We just started allowing Droids. Need a fall back solution!
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 01, 201
LOL! You have no idea! Been on the phone almost daily with RIM and MS for
the last 3 weeks... EAS is going full swing soon I think...
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Better than BES!
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tu
I just disabled your account. How's EAS working for you right now Martin?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Exch 2010.
>
> If I disable a users acct, does that disable their AS access as well? Or do
> I need to go into EMC and disable AS in there as well?
>
>
>
> ---
>
B and C probably also receive meeting requests for user A due to the
delegate configuration. B or C, might have some kind of rule or delagate on
their mailbox as well...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Wayne Dueck wrote:
> I mis-spoke on the delegate question. I was looking at the mailbox
> per
ultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/>
> --
> *From:* Don Ely [don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 22, 2010 8:08 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: to CDO or not CDO?
Given that the EWS version is STILL not available, I would guess you have
some time before this becomes an issue...
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Damien Solodow wrote:
> Would be nice but it leaves pre 2007 Exchange shops SOL. ;)
> --
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
>
> *F
ith
>
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
>
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/>
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 17, 2010 6:55 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Exchange 2007 RAID
Wait! There are smart people here?!?!?
::unsubscribes::
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Michael B. Smith wrote:
> It isn’t that simple.
>
>
>
> MSFT has different recommendation depending on your hardware deployment,
> your investments, how many mailboxes, etc. etc. etc.
>
>
>
> If you are go
Have you turned up OAB logging? Are you distributing the OAB via web only
or Public folders too? Have you tried deleting the OAB files on the desktop
client and looking at a fresh copy of the OAB?
The sig is smaller, but that doesn't make it any less painful. In its
original form, it was simply
I'll stick with having a future so bright, I don't need an email so bright I
gotta wear shades..
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Roger Scudder
wrote:
> Maybe it’s his company’s policy to use a red 20 point serif font for
> signatures.
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailt
Fix that sig, and it might resolve the GAL issue though the OAB issue will
likely still remain...
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Chris Drobny
wrote:
> Well the GAL is updating, I didn’t see anything on that link for the
> OAB. Just to double check where should I look for the generation serv
I didn't want to remember CC:Mail...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jeff Steward wrote:
> LOL, yeah, I worked with that too, and a few versions of ::shudder::
> CC:Mail.
>
> -Jeff Steward
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Don Ely wrote:
>
>> MS Mail 3
MS Mail 3.0 was the shizzle...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jeff Steward wrote:
> Those three sentences made me think "Wow, we've come a long way since
> Exchange 4."
>
> -Jeff Steward
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Michael B. Smith
> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>> You need DAG for MB role,
P
K
B
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Andy Shook wrote:
> Then why tell the freakin' list that you did so? Dumb as a bag of
> hammers
>
> Shook
> -Original Message-
> From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin
Dunno. I just know 4.1 was just released... I'm running 2010 without issue...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Joseph L. Casale"
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:56:01
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Activesync i
Probably the upgrade to 4.1... ;)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: KevinM
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:50:08
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Activesync issue
That was my thinking as well...
From: Michael B.
I'd create a new recipeint policy with the new domain and let it apply to
your users. Then, if you want to consolidate them, go ahead and delete the
policy you created and add the domain to your default policy.
Caveat: If you have any of your users set to not get their update
automatically via r
rs and once completed rebuild old physical server.
>
>
>
> So what are my steps, is there a white paper?
>
>
>
> So far my plan is a complete trust, move a few test users over, and set
> permissions groups etc. then slowly take servers from old domain and add to
> new.
>
&
virtualize or whatever.
>
> I need a plan and an estimated cost, then I start to budget for it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:02 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
doing it is not an option, what do I have
> to do to get it done.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:57 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Changing domain name
>
>
>
> /De
/Deja Vu
Didn't we just go through this yesterday? Or was that another list?
It's not supported, it doesn't work, start over from scratch and migrate if
you really want to change things...
/Deja Vu
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Brumbaugh, Luke <
luke.brumba...@butlerschein.com> wrote:
> M
Uhhh, what part of "it doesn't work" did you miss there... It only works
and is only supported under Windows 2003/Exchange 2003. No more, no less...
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Leedy, Andy wrote:
> I can’t exactly say that gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling.
>
> Sounds like pull the trigge
I'm fairly certain you answered your own question. Did I miss something?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Leedy, Andy wrote:
> Can a domain be renamed with an Exchange 2007 server in it?
>
> Note: our internal domain is different than our public domain.
>
>
>
>
>
> According Microsoft it is not
We exmerged the email out of the mailboxes to prevent that...
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Maglinger, Paul wrote:
> I remember that day too. Got it mostly cleaned up and a @#%!$ user
> opened it up a second time! Grrr… Learned a lot from that little lesson.
>
>
>
&g
t;
> Of course…this may depend on OS. We are still running XP.
>
>
>
> Within 10 minutes of the appearance on our network we had the website
> blocked…and then started getting calls to the Help Desk complaining about
> the link being blocked. Sheesh…
>
>
>
> *Larry*
&
gt;
> Of course…this may depend on OS. We are still running XP.
>
>
>
> Within 10 minutes of the appearance on our network we had the website
> blocked…and then started getting calls to the Help Desk complaining about
> the link being blocked. Sheesh…
>
>
>
One thing we noticed is that if a user was not running with admin rights,
the virus couldn't run...
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Don Andrews wrote:
> Appears that we had less than 100 copies come in and our AS caught and
> dropped every one of them >:-)
>
>
> --
That's what I did for our company...
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tom Kern wrote:
> For those on ex2k7 or ex2k10-
>
>
>
> Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> *New-TransportRule* *-Name* 'Here you have' *-Comments* '' *-Priority* '0'
> *-Enabled* $true *-SubjectContainsWords* 'here you have' *-DeleteMessage
Put the FE on the inside with the other server and just publish 443 for OWA
to the internet. You can do this with ISA in the DMZ or not
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Lynden A. Philadelphia <
lphiladelp...@philadelphiagroup.com> wrote:
> What do you suggest?
>
>
>
> Lynden
>
>
>
>
>
> *Fro
:
Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.
Rocks are history. Google Stones is in.
From: Don Ely so sc stops complaining [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:58 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange is history?: Moved two clients to GoogleApps this
we
I got a rock...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Blackstone"
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:54:40
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Exchange is history?:
Moved two clients to GoogleApps this week.
What we
Get a new upper level exec?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hart
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:42:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: OT - Outlook 2003 HTML
replies to text emails?
I have an upper level exec
Missy is everywhere...
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: "Michael B. Smith"
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 19:35:29
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Reply-To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: Help with unsolicited mail
Missy? On THIS mailing list? Wow.
Regard
Got Deleted Items Retention turned on? Could look at that... Other nasty
option would be if you're performing brick level backups on the mailboxes...
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Postmaster wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a user who’s Blackberry overwrote his calendar and he is asking if
> w
How many users Greg?
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:07 PM, wrote:
> Just thought I would let you know the results of the move. We were a bit
> concerned about the loss of SIS, but we had 4 Databases of varying sizes
> across the org and total DB size including STM files was 171 GB on Exchange
> 200
Curious, why are you moving away from Zantaz?
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:42 PM, John Cook wrote:
> We currently use Zantaz EAS but I would consider it overkill in your
> environment. We're moving to Sunbelt Email Archiver in the coming months.
>
> --
> *From*: Cameron
> asleep...)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Don Ely wrote:
>
>> Verizon online at 2330 last night
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Martin Blackstone > > wrote:
>>
>>> Mine on ATT is back up.
>>>
>>> How about Verizon or Sprint?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Verizon online at 2330 last night
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Mine on ATT is back up.
>
> How about Verizon or Sprint?
>
>
>
We are Verizon too... Up in the PNW though...
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Jeff Brown <2jbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just heard from a friend here in Tulsa, his AT&T BES service came back up
> before he went to bed last night. We are on Verizon and still down.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:
Yep, ours started working at 2330 PST last night
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:32 AM, James Wells wrote:
> Might want to check your end...Blackberry indicated that full service
> was restored around 0545 EST. Should have at least seen SOMETHING
> trickle in by now
>
> BIS or something else might
I know! You'd think they'd have a clue...
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Fskers
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:44 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re:
Well, that explains why mine is doing nothing... :(
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Martin Blackstone wrote:
> Seems we are having a similar issue. No BB service at all.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 22, 2009 6:20 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin
memorable list quote came from your
> good self Don – some doofus started slamming everyone for talking about the
> World Trade Center on 9-11.
>
>
>
> Your two word response was all that was required – well done J
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
>
has a little bit of the same
> attitude.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:21 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* A blast from the past...
>
>
&g
For those of you who think it can get ugly around here...
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2009/12/old-quotes-from-an-old-exchange-list.html
Perfmon
On 12/2/09, Shoaib Ahmad wrote:
> Is there any free monitoring tool for Microsoft Exchange 2007 (CCR
> environment) which can do the followings,
>
> 1: Count incoming and outgoing E-mail.
> 2: E-mail traffic graphs including SMTP graphs.
> 3: Services health check like IMAP,POP, informati
IronPort does this...
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Simon Butler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know of any anti spam application or appliance that has support
> for multiple independent LDAP lookups at the domain level? I have a client
> that has a single IP address, but three completely
SSN. It quarantined and notified based on the SSN. I then looked at the
> notify message (which includes the evaluated headers).
>
> (that was easier than using Outlooks poor interface to read headers)
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Don Ely wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that woul
. But, I can
> modify the filter to filter something else (e.g. a key word rather than a
> header), and the filter works. So I assume that means it is attached?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Don Ely wrote:
>
>> Did you attach the filter to the SMTP listener?
>
Did you attach the filter to the SMTP listener?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Lundy wrote:
> Just got a couple of Ironports. I'm trying to write an outgoing content
> filter to identify digitally signed messages. I've tried "Other Header"
> with header name of Content-Type and value c
s are run on RAID5 SAS 10k disk sets. Most of the rest of the storage
> are in much larger and cheaper (but slower) near-line SAS arrays.
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:16 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Ex
n’t missing anything in the setup, routing, permissions, etc…
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:02 PM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Exchange Deployment Services
>
>
have brilliant
> recommendations as well, so let’s hear them!
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:50 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Exchange Deployment Services
>
>
>
How many users are we talking about?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Brad Metzler wrote:
> Gentlemen,
>
>
>
> We are looking to upgrade from E2k3 to E2k7 or possibly even 2010
> immediately. I am looking for recommendations on providers, partners, or
> individuals in the Portland Oregon area t
want them to be able to fully admin their exchange
> servers. I think we want them to be able to manage their servers but make
> sure they can’t screw up the entire org.
>
> From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:23 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin
most part, we want them to be able to fully admin their exchange
> servers. I think we want them to be able to manage their servers but make
> sure they can’t screw up the entire org.
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:23 A
What kind of management is required on the Exchange servers is required by
the admins in the sister company?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Mayo, Shay wrote:
>
>
> We are about to merge our 2000 user sister company into our Active
> Directory. We have always had a single domain architecture an
I subscribe to lists like these with my gmail and that is it. No, I
do not trust them...
On 10/21/09, John Hornbuckle wrote:
> You must, too-at least to some degree, since you're writing from a Gmail
> address.
>
> :)
>
>
>
> From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.co
"And, frankly, we trusted the Google name."
U, what? Really? Wow...
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Hornbuckle <
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:
> We had looked at them, but they were considerably more expensive than
> Postini. And, frankly, we trusted the Google name.
>
I've only seen that when people thought the messages were being delivered to
the "mailbox", but instead were being delivered to a PST file...
Something to try... Shut down Outlook on users PC. Send user an email.
Open OWA. Do you see the message?
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Margo wrote:
We use IronPort. Wound up costing us much less to go down that road...
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Link wrote:
> And what are you using now?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Don Guyer wrote:
>
>> We dumped Postini because of reasons such as this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Don Guyer
>>
>>
I'm so glad I don't use Postini anymore...
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, John Hornbuckle <
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us> wrote:
> I'm having rotten luck with Postini's junk mail filtering, and wondering
> if I was the only one. Here's a typical example:
>
>
>
>
>
> Note that only 2 messa
ng 20 users. The DB(s?) will be on my SQL db
> server.
>
>
>
> Sean Rector, MCSE
> ----------
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2009 12:55 PM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: BES v5
gt; They do not suggest (or support) BES 5 on Hyper V
>
>
> ----------
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2009 10:34 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: BES v5 newb - yet another question...
>
>
More like a fanboy... hehehehehe
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Webster wrote:
> I believe ME2 is a huge ASSP fan.
>
>
>
>
>
> Webster
>
>
>
> *From:* KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
> *Subject:* RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?
>
>
>
> Anyone out there used ASSP for Anti-spams? I’ve been givin
It should be fine on Hyper V. I am running mine on 2008 R2
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Steve Ens wrote:
> Hey Sean
> I run by BES on Hyper V...no issues (but I am on 4.x). I used a W2K3
> server.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Sean Rector wrote:
>
>> The documentation states tha
Same Org, same AD? Then yes...
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Sean Rector wrote:
> Question for you BES v5 admins…
>
>
>
> We’re about to embark on implementing this in our organization. We’re on
> Exchange 2003, but my own mailbox has been moved (the test case, you know…)
> to our Exchange
1 - 100 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
