7;s a
headache.
Speaking of headaches, perhaps we should look at why maintaining an
Exchange server causes you headaches.
William
-Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Co-locati
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Co-locating mail
you
will not be able to use any of the other features of Exchange. Exchange was
originally designed as more of a Groups ware application. it did not have
native SMTP until 2k. it was still an add on in 5.5 keep that in
mind
MAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Co-locating
mail
I
have Exchange 5.5 with 200 mailboxes. Director of the company is asking me if
it is worth to co-locate emails with ISP. I checked with one of the ISP and
looks like its very c
inm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Co-locating
mail
I
have Exchange 5.5 with 200 mailboxes. Director of the company is asking me if
!!
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA,
CKWSE
-Original Message-From: Anwar Qureshi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:56
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Co-locating
mail
I
have Exchange 5.5 with 200 mailboxes. Director of the company is asking me
I have
Exchange 5.5 with 200 mailboxes. Director of the company is asking me if it is
worth to co-locate emails with ISP. I checked with one of the ISP and looks like
its very cheap if the ISP will host our company's email. I think the advantage
will be that there will be less headaches for
