RE: Exchange 2010 Automatic Mailbox Distribution

2011-06-10 Thread Paul Hutchings
maybe 2 out of 4 would be active and 2 passive. From: Michael B. Smith [mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: 10 June 2011 1:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Automatic Mailbox Distribution You can move within a single CAS-array on the fly

RE: Exchange 2010 Automatic Mailbox Distribution

2011-06-10 Thread Michael B. Smith
Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Automatic Mailbox Distribution Not sure if there is a right or wrong answer to this, so I guess I'd simply appreciate any input and feedback. I have a single 2010 CAS/HT/MBX

Exchange 2010 Automatic Mailbox Distribution

2011-06-09 Thread Paul Hutchings
Not sure if there is a right or wrong answer to this, so I guess I'd simply appreciate any input and feedback. I have a single 2010 CAS/HT/MBX server running 2010 SP1 RU 3v3 Standard Edition. It has a pair of LUNs allocated from our SAN, one for logs, one for databases. I have approx. 500 mai