, August 02, 2002 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
Ya... In-place upgrades suck.
Let us know how Saturday goes.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Ya... In-place upgrades suck.
Let us know how Saturday goes.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you&#x
ange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just another reason that I do not like "upgrades". Migrations -
yes. Upgrades - NO. I do not think I would ever attempt to upgrade my
5.5 server to 2000. I would procure separate hardware for the new 20
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm
not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready
to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the n
riday, August 02, 2002 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm
not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready
to upgrade might want to
This is just an informational post, you're welcome to comment on it but I'm
not really asking any questions. Just thought folks out there getting ready
to upgrade might want to hear the story. I just spent the night upgrading
(or trying to upgrade) my exchange 5.5 server.
We have a very simple
I'm sorry, we're using Outlook 2000. I'm thinking it's more on the
server side.
-Original Message-
From: Lambert, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade
Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade
We just upgraded our network from nt4/exch5.5 to 2KAD/Exch2K. Quite
often when someone opens Outlook on their desktop, they will get the
"Microsoft Exchange Server is Unavailable" message. Upon clicking
"Retry" the almost always get
We just upgraded our network from nt4/exch5.5 to 2KAD/Exch2K. Quite
often when someone opens Outlook on their desktop, they will get the
"Microsoft Exchange Server is Unavailable" message. Upon clicking
"Retry" the almost always get in, but this problem is quite annoying.
Anyone have any experie
I'm glad you clarified that, I confused myself with my own post... :o)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
IIS is needed for both. Indeed
IIS is needed for both. Indeed FE/BE communication is over port 80.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Provided you have ADS already installed, unless you
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Dude, you should and need IIS for exchange 2000
The exchange 2000 store is a web based engine.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to
Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
My exchange 5.5 box currently is NOT running IIS at all. According to MS
documentation I need to install II and NNTP on my Exchange 5.5 box BEFORE
upgrading to 2000. Is that true? I'd rather not have IIS on it if
possible but it looks like its a
Yes, it is a core requirement.
The SMTP service for example is extended from IIS.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
My exchange 5.5 box currently is NOT
My exchange 5.5 box currently is NOT running IIS at all. According to MS
documentation I need to install II and NNTP on my Exchange 5.5 box BEFORE
upgrading to 2000. Is that true? I'd rather not have IIS on it if
possible but it looks like its a core requirement now. thanks.
List Charter and
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration
All:
We are a small business, 1 exchange server/PDC and 1 BDC all NT4 at this
point We are slowly moving to win 2000 and our first task is to upgrade
to exchange 2000 on a new machine from exchange 5.5 (on nt4 sp6). Do any
of
Umm..
The Exchange upgrade would be your second task. Moving to AD would be your
first.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration
All:
We are a small
All:
We are a small business, 1 exchange server/PDC and 1 BDC all NT4 at this
point We are slowly moving to win 2000 and our first task is to upgrade to
exchange 2000 on a new machine from exchange 5.5 (on nt4 sp6). Do any of
you have a feel for now long it will take to migrage a 3.4 gig informati
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration moving servers
Use the Ed Crowley method:
Exchange 5.5 - FAQ
Appendix A - The Ed Crowley Server Move Method
This method should create much less potential for grief because you can have practically zero perceived downtime. You can perform all
I have been struggling with this for a couple of weeks.
I am trying to move NT Domain that includes exchange 5.5 to Windows 2000
Active directory and Exchange 2000. The MS Migration tool seems to be fine
but the Exchange mail box option is grayed out. Anyone have any experience
with this?
Tha
20 matches
Mail list logo
