RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-14 Thread violettek
om: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct.   Are you moving from 5.5 to 2K?    J (CB) ---

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread William Lefkovics
Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct.   Are you

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread William Lefkovics
[mailto:  ]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge Yes.   It's been an adventure since my arrival here.   But yes.  Dallas has 12 people migrate

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread Sabo, Eric
-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge Yes.   It's been an adventure since my arrival here.   But yes.  Dallas has 12 people migrated with 100 more this week to my first ever Exchange2000 cluster install.  

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread William Lefkovics
first server to join a 5.5 site.   -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 5:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct.  

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread Sabo, Eric
Pennsylvania -Original Message-From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge You are, of course, correct.   Are you moving from 5.5 to

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-12 Thread Arnold, Jamie
cluster installation of excha nge >>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers.    Only that the return seems to exceed the effort.    Active/Passive is best for now.   William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [Exchange2000] An Active/Active cluster installation of excha nge

2002-03-11 Thread William Lefkovics
>>Is there anything that they forget to tell you in these papers.    Only that the return seems to exceed the effort.    Active/Passive is best for now.   William -Original Message-From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:12 AMTo: MS-Exchang