Because it irritates the hell out of people on email lists?
-sp
-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: A Despised Subject
I need to make an argument to management about continuin
Title: RE: A Despised Subject
The main reason I refuse to implement it is mailing lists. I have not seen a mail loop to outside users, but it irritates the h_ll out of lists, and creates NDRs everywhere with autoresponse addresses
-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto
Matthew Carpenter
.com>cc:
Title: RE: A Despised Subject
Nor does everyone care.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A Despised Subject
Also, a bad practice in terms of "social engine
Title: RE: A Despised Subject
Yes: one user, works on two sites with a mailbox at each. Normally set to automatically forward mail from here to the other site - not under my control, which allows OOO to internet. Goes on leave and puts an
OOO message at the other end: message gets sent to
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, at 9:12am, Lynn Karen wrote:
> Yes: one user, works on two sites with a mailbox at each. Normally set to
> automatically forward mail from here to the other site - not under my
> control, which allows OOO to internet. Goes on leave and puts an OOO
> message at the other end:
TECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: A Despised Subject
>
> Also, a bad practice in terms of "social engineering". Now everyone knows
> that person X is on vacation, etc.
>
>
I caused a mail loop on this list some number of years ago. I set on the
Friday I left, and by the time I got home, I remembered I didn't change this
list to "Nomail".
By the time I got home to turn off the OOO, I had 20,000 email messages in
my inbox, and apologized profusely to the members of
