Re: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-18 Thread Tanya Pinetti
All you need is a spare public IP and NAT it to your HT server. I prefer not using an Edge server if you are sending all outbound emails to FOPE since your networking team will have an ACL on the firewall allowing only your HT server SMTP access to the FOPE subnet. Sent from my iPhone On Mar

Re: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-18 Thread Peter Johnson
Nope. U should be able to set up a dedicated NAT rule for SMTP only and configure FOPE with the public IP address as the inbound SMTP IP address. That is the way I had it setup and never had an issue. Sent on the run! On 18 Mar 2013, at 17:54, Alexander Rose wrote: > Hi all, > > We current

RE: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-18 Thread Kennedy, Jim
This is for outgoing email correct? You still only need one public IP. NAT both servers to the same IP. I would assume you can still use the old IP your spam appliance usedshould be a quick setup in your firewall. From: Alexander Rose [mailto:arose...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 18, 201

RE: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-18 Thread Kennedy, Jim
email...your two HT servers. Have anything else legit relay through those. From: Kennedy, Jim Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Design question regarding smart-host This is for outgoing email correct? You still only need one public IP. NAT both servers t

RE: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-18 Thread Tanya Pinetti
o-one NAT assuming you have enough public IPs. For me, one-to-one makes troubleshooting easier. From: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Design question regarding smart-host Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:17:51 + This is for outgoing

Re: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-19 Thread Alexander Rose
kes > troubleshooting easier. > > -- > From: kennedy...@elyriaschools.org > To: exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > > Subject: RE: Design question regarding smart-host > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:17:51 + > > > > > This is for outgoing email c

Re: Design question regarding smart-host

2013-03-19 Thread Alexander Rose
h one public IP NAT'd to both HT >> servers (as mentioned by Jim below), I would prefer a one-to-one NAT >> assuming you have enough public IPs. For me, one-to-one makes >> troubleshooting easier. >> >> ---------- >> From: kennedy...@elyrias