Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Jonathan Link
What exactly is the boss wanting to do? Before I took my present position, the previous person bought DisclaimIt. There is a 2010 version. And it works quite well on 2003. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: > Is anyone using CodeTwo's Exchange Rules product? Any thoughts

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Richard Stovall
Signatures mostly, but the desire to embed graphics in HTML-formatted ones is high on the list of requirements, so vanilla transport rules are out. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Link wrote: > What exactly is the boss wanting to do? > > Before I took my present position, the previous p

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Roger Wright
We've been using it for a couple years now. Easy to setup and maintain and just works. Roger Wright ___ ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION: the inability to become excited over any of the choices for President put forth by either party in the 2012 election year On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Richard

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread PRamatowski
Don't know, maybe its just Symantec some sigs with fancy bits get caught here as "unscannable" and get the message tossed. /.02¥ worth Blackberry From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 03:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Don Andrews
+1 Neatsy cutesy signatures bad on internal email, unforgivable on external. From: pramatow...@mediageneral.com [mailto:pramatow...@mediageneral.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:15 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures Don't know, maybe its

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Kurt Buff
om: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 03:56 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures > > > Signatures mostly, but the desire to embed graphics in HTML-formatted ones > is high on the list of requiremen

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread PRamatowski
Dancing banana and "Under Construction" Blackberry - Original Message - From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 07:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures Oh, you spoilsport. Don't you think th

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Campbell, Rob
Everybody needs a mail store full of half-meg emails with 50 bytes of actual message in them -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:12 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures Oh

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Campbell, Rob
I should write an EWS script that runs as a scheduled task and sends an email to the list and deletes all the OOFs before I get to work. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Michael B. Smith
I don't see them anymore. I wrote a couple of rules that delete them. -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures I should write a

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Campbell, Rob
Mailbox or transport? -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures I don't see them anymore. I wrote a couple of rules that delete them. -Original Message-

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Michael B. Smith
Mailbox. I wouldn't presume to make the assumption for my other mailbox users. :-P -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures Ma

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Campbell, Rob
That doesn't help my phone. -Original Message- From: Michael B. Smith Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 7:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures Mailbox. I wouldn't presume to make the assumption for my other mailbox users. :-P ---

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Michael B. Smith
It's a server-side rule. I don't see why it wouldn't help your phone... -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 8:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures That

Re: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-23 Thread Richard Stovall
Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2012 2:15 PM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > *Subject:* Re: Disclaimers and Signatures > > ** ** > > Don't know, maybe its just Symantec some sigs with fancy bits get caught > here as "unscannable" and get the message tossed

RE: Disclaimers and Signatures

2012-02-24 Thread Don Andrews
Your phone doesn't sync deletes??? -Original Message- From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Disclaimers and Signatures That doesn't help my phone. -Origin