__
From: Rimmel, Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
I opened (and closed) a ticket just last week with Microsoft trying to
solve the "route to specific send connectors" is
ECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
Does your remote MTA support AUTH?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tu
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
Does your remote MTA support AUTH?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
Does your remote MTA support AUTH?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
I've l
connectors.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
Oh. Duh.
You can use get/set/remove-adpermission on the connector. Those do work.
Regards,
: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
I think I might have come closer to getting it to work under E2K3. There at
least you could create an SMTP connector, and control who could send through
it.
In 2007, there doesn't seem to be any access control on the send connectors.
If it's t
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
I think I might have come closer to getting it to work under E2K3. There at
least you could create an SMTP connector, and control who could send through it.
In 2007, ther
n Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
I don't think you can do this the way you want. I don't think any
released version of Exchange could.
You need another set of HT's or Edges in there.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialE
I don't think you can do this the way you want. I don't think any released
version of Exchange could.
You need another set of HT's or Edges in there.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
Would not create a loop, HT -> MTA -> HT -> ES. I do not see how you
are going to differentiate the message on the HT so it knows to send it
to the ES. Every message that comes into the HT will send it to the MTA
server which will send it back to the HT which
S-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
There is an implicit send connector created on the HT server to the
Edge server when you create an edge subscription that is most likely
overrriding your new send con.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Campbell, Rob
<[EMAIL PROT
over and over. If every outbound needs to go to the MTA server why not
have the MTA server send directly to the ES?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 2:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 routing puzzle.
Th
There is an implicit send connector created on the HT server to the
Edge server when you create an edge subscription that is most likely
overrriding your new send con.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Campbell, Rob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a situation where I need to send all ou
13 matches
Mail list logo
