RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Maglinger, Paul
: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper So wait, now employees can't file paper or emails? So where does this important company correspondence go? In the trash? Try

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Maglinger, Paul
The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don't we have a likewise obligation? From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread John Cook
Vision Whitepaper The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don’t we have a likewise obligation? From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision

Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread sms adm
:53:28 2010 *Subject*: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don’t we have a likewise obligation? *From:* John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] *Sent:* Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:21 AM *To:* MS

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Martin Blackstone
be. From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper The users have a obligation to use the technology responsibly. Don't we have a likewise obligation? From: John

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Martin Blackstone
Exactly….. From: sms adm [mailto:sms...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper We're getting into a philosophical discussion :)

Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread John Cook
something has to give. And we have archiving in place, that makes a huge difference. From: Michael B. Smith To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Mon Mar 29 09:32:29 2010 Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper And that’s a key factor – not all

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Maglinger, Paul
to things I can change. J From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper Absolutely. But (and this isn't philsopical it's financial) 99.9% of the end users have

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Martin Blackstone
Im confused. Is that what you are forced to do? You have no limits? From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper That’s the problem with letting the typical

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Maglinger, Paul
, 2010 9:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper Im confused. Is that what you are forced to do? You have no limits? From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 6:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread greg.sweers
: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper Oh no. We do have limits. But then they complain when they fill up the mailbox like it’s somehow our fault. Again, another

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-29 Thread Maglinger, Paul
.. From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper Oh no. We do have limits. But then they complain when they fill up the mailbox like it’s somehow our fault

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-28 Thread Sam Cayze
, 2010 10:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper rant on Dear employees, Is your file cabinet full? Can't stuff another piece of paper in it? Don't worry, we just bought you a bigger file cabinet so you don't have to clean out the useless

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-28 Thread John Hornbuckle
: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper rant on Dear employees, Is your file cabinet full? Can't stuff another piece of paper in it? Don't worry, we just bought

Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-28 Thread Ben Scott
The nerve of users, expecting to use the email server to store email. Next they'll be putting files on the file server, or using the print server to print. -- Ben

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-28 Thread Steve Szabo
In some small companies, at least, the latter two would be miracles of sorts. \\Steve// -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper

2010-03-27 Thread Maglinger, Paul
rant on Dear employees, Is your file cabinet full? Can't stuff another piece of paper in it? Don't worry, we just bought you a bigger file cabinet so you don't have to clean out the useless cr*p in your old one, compliments of Microsoft. Next we have to figure out how to finance the backup