I recently moved a client from SBS 2003 to google apps. google apps is
clunkier as far as managing accounts/email addresses and migrating data.
Bill
Dave wrote:
Just outsourced from Exchange 2003 to Google mail. My experience is
Google Mail has an inferior interface and features. OTOH we
-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
I don't know exact cost amounts, but I can tell you we went through a
similar comparison and the costs were relatively the same for both, so
it
basically depended on the client's feelings towards in-house vs. hosting
in general
, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4
-Original Message-
From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:jasongu...@npumail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
+1
Actually, for us, more expensive to outsource due to the amount
offerings out
there when it comes to the details.
~JasonG
-Original Message-
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@unetek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 16:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
I don't know exact cost amounts, but I can
immature service offerings out
there when it comes to the details.
~JasonG
-Original Message-
From: Jay Dale [mailto:jd...@unetek.commailto:jd...@unetek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 16:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
I don't know
Hi Michael
You are saying the amount of resources are less or the licensing costs
are less?
Cheers
Ryan
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
vs cloud
Hi Michael
You are saying the amount of resources are less or the licensing costs are less?
Cheers
Ryan
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
Just outsourced from Exchange 2003 to Google mail. My experience is Google
Mail has an inferior interface and features. OTOH we do not have good in
house Exchange people or a commitment from administration to train and
dedicate a person to in house Exchange.
From: Scott Schneider
That's all because it depends. There are consultancies growing up around this
just like consultancies around deploying Exchange in-house.
The questions are not necessarily easy to answer.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Scott
How many mailboxes? (Not just users).
From: Scott Schneider [mailto:sschnei...@inscapesolutions.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
Our current hardware goes end of life this year. We are looking at either
upgrading
About 350 mailboxes
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: June-15-11 2:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 in-house vs cloud
How many mailboxes? (Not just users).
From: Scott Schneider [mailto:sschnei...@inscapesolutions.com]
Sent: Wednesday
I don't know exact cost amounts, but I can tell you we went through a similar
comparison and the costs were relatively the same for both, so it basically
depended on the client's feelings towards in-house vs. hosting in general and
weighing the pros and cons of both.
Jay Dale
Senior Systems
12 matches
Mail list logo
