We are planning to do the same in the next month or two. Thanks for the
post and I'm looking forward to hearing how it works out.
Gene A Scruggs
American College of Emergency Physicians
Technical Support Manager
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
This is just another reason that I do not like upgrades. Migrations -
yes. Upgrades - NO. I do not think I would ever attempt to upgrade my 5.5
server to 2000. I would procure separate hardware for the new 2000 server.
If any of you get MCP mag, you will read in one of the last issues almost
Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just another reason that I do not like upgrades. Migrations -
yes. Upgrades - NO. I do not think I would ever attempt to upgrade my
5.5 server to 2000. I would procure separate hardware for the new 2000
server. If any of you
Ya... In-place upgrades suck.
Let us know how Saturday goes.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
This is just an informational post, you're
, August 02, 2002 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Upgrade horror story
Ya... In-place upgrades suck.
Let us know how Saturday goes.
-Original Message-
From: Tom.Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 7:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Your answer is well documented in the following Q Article. You can increase
the time out value or suppress the message completely.
PSS ID Number: Q293650
-Original Message-
From: Frey, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Yes, it is a core requirement.
The SMTP service for example is extended from IIS.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
My exchange 5.5 box currently is NOT
Provided you have ADS already installed, unless you have the enterprise
version and are looking at a FE/BE config, then yes, IIS is required for OWA
and such...
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Dude, you should and need IIS for exchange 2000
The exchange 2000 store is a web based engine.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5
IIS is needed for both. Indeed FE/BE communication is over port 80.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 1:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Provided you have ADS already installed, unless you
I'm glad you clarified that, I confused myself with my own post... :o)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
IIS is needed for both. Indeed FE
I would think not long at all, your best bet is probably to exmerge the
3.4 gb and then exmerge it back in. If you do it this way you can bring
the pst files local and be up much sooner.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:38
Umm..
The Exchange upgrade would be your second task. Moving to AD would be your
first.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis DeVries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration
All:
We are a small
Looks pretty conclusive, I'll schedule an upgrade. Thanks for all
contributions.
Tony.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
The ability to use NTBackup to backup Exchange to disk is worth it alone.
William
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:18 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Looks pretty conclusive
More than happily.
Fresh install or upgrade from NT underneath?
William
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on
Works fine here.
I had Exch 5.5 on NT4. Built Win2K from scratch, and loaded Exch 5.5 on it.
Then MOVEd mailboxes over. Even installed OWA and it was able to keep up
with me. About 25 users. The only caveat, make sure both Exch 5.5 had
similar installations, same SP loaded, and were able to
Works great for me...(even with ArcserveIT)...on a clean install of Win2K.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
I am running E5.5 SP4 on our Windows 2000 DC's
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Does Exchange 5.5 run
Runs great, we have 8, 2K machines running 5.5 SP4.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Does Exchange 5.5 run happily on Windows 2000
Yes. I have 15 MSX 5.5 SP4 boxes all running W2K enterprise. Most have
been upgrades from NT4 too. Nothing but good things to say about it so far.
Especially the terminal service : )
Tim Jensen
Cingular Wireless, Chicago
-Original Message-
From: Tony Flannery [mailto:[EMAIL
Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Yes. I have 15 MSX 5.5 SP4 boxes all running W2K enterprise. Most have
been upgrades from NT4 too. Nothing but good things to say about it so far.
Especially the terminal service : )
Tim Jensen
Cingular Wireless, Chicago
-Original
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Sheesh that is a lot of Exchanging!
-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
Runs great, we have 8, 2K
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server
just service pack 4 and 2 them !!
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)
Allen,
We went from an Exch 5.5 NT4 Server to an Exch 5.5 W2k Server, exactly the way you mentioned.
Don Guyer
Information Systems
Citadel Federal Credit Union
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: 800.666.0191 x7072
Fax: 610.380.6083
not
start. I'm sure others will chime in on this one.
Tim Jensen
Cingular Wireless, Chicago
-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on 2000 server (recovery server)
I
William,
Will probably upgrade.
Tony
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:21
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5
on 2000 server (recovery server)
Tim,
I went from an NT4
SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4 box, to an W2k SP1 Exchange 5.5 SP4 box. I installed
Exchange on the new W2k box
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 migration moving servers
Use the Ed Crowley method:
Exchange 5.5 - FAQ
Appendix A - The Ed Crowley Server Move Method
This method should create much less potential for grief because you can have practically zero perceived downtime. You can perform all
# of users ?
More info needed..
Yes, it is stable
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 16:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
I want to implement Exchange but am not sure whether to install 5.5 or
This is for our in-house system. No more than 10-users. Primarily want
to install to start learning the system.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Have you got Win2K with AD? You need it for E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
This is for our in-house system. No more than 10-users. Primarily
What type of NT domain do you have? If you have an NT4 domain, E55. If you
have AD, try E2K.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
I want to implement Exchange
Yes, ADS is installed already.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Please be sure to include the text below your message so we know who you are
replying too.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
Yes, ADS is installed
Exchange2000 is as stable as the person installing it.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
I want to implement Exchange but am not sure whether to install 5.5
Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
Exchange2000 is as stable as the person installing it.
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
I want to implement Exchange
:
|
| Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
We have W2K Server with ADS installed.
Henry Ward
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
-Original Message-
From: Henry Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
We have W2K Server with ADS installed.
Henry Ward
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com
you calling my installs bad?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 1:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
It must have stopped.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: STU _ MAIL LOOP _ RE: Exchange 5.5 or 2000
What are you talking about, no mail loop from this end
-Original
42 matches
Mail list logo
